arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2209.06196astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
收藏

QCD时期原初黑洞形成的模拟及其与GWTC-3星表的比较

Simulations of PBH formation at the QCD epoch and comparison with the GWTC-3 catalog

Albert Escrivà, Eleni Bagui, Sebastien Clesse

AI总结:

本研究首次模拟QCD时期状态方程变化对原初黑洞形成的影响,发现其质量分布显著改变,并合率与GWTC-3数据相符,但无法解释次级峰,暗示可能存在混合黑洞群体。

摘要:

已知原初黑洞(PBH)的形成概率在量子色动力学(QCD)交叉期间因状态方程的轻微降低而得到增强。这导致PBH质量分布中出现一个高峰和其他特征。但迄今为止,PBH形成过程中这种变化的影响一直被忽视。在本工作中,我们首次通过考虑QCD时期变化的状态方程来模拟PBHs的形成,使用不同的曲率剖面计算过密度阈值,并发现由此产生的PBH质量分布受到显著影响。早期和晚期PBH双星系统的预期并合率分布与从GWTC-3星表推断出的暗物质分数在$0.1 < f_{\rm PBH} <1 $范围内的结果相当。根据体积灵敏度估计的引力波事件分布可以解释质量约为$30-50 M_\odot$的并合事件,如GW190814这样的不对称质量系统,或如GW190521这样的位于对不稳定性质量间隙中的事件。然而,所考虑的案例中没有一个导致具有次级峰在$8-15 M_\odot$附近的多峰分布,正如GWTC-3星表所暗示的那样,这可能指向天体物理和原初黑洞的混合群体。

英文摘要:

The probability of primordial black hole (PBH) formation is known to be boosted during the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) crossover due to a slight reduction of the equation of state. This induces a high peak and other features in the PBH mass distribution. But the impact of this variation during the PBH formation has been so far neglected. In this work we simulate for the first time the formation of PBHs by taking into account the varying equation of state at the QCD epoch, compute the over-density threshold using different curvature profiles and find that the resulting PBH mass distributions are significantly impacted. The expected merger rate distributions of early and late PBH binaries is comparable to the ones inferred from the GWTC-3 catalog for dark matter fractions in PBHs within $0.1 < f_{\rm PBH} <1 $. The distribution of gravitational-wave events estimated from the volume sensitivity could explain mergers around $30-50 M_\odot$, with asymmetric masses like GW190814, or in the pair-instability mass gap like GW190521. However, none of the considered cases leads to a multi-modal distribution with a secondary peak around $8-15 M_\odot$, as suggested by the GWTC-3 catalog, possibly pointing to a mixed population of astrophysical and primordial black holes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑