arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2203.05899cs.CL
收藏

实现开放域对话系统的可靠人的评估

Achieving Reliable Human Assessment of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems

ADAPT Centre(ADAPT中心);Dublin City University(都柏林城市大学);Trinity College Dublin(都柏林圣三一学院);SFI Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning(爱尔兰科学基金会机器学习研究培训中心);Huawei(华为);Noah’s Ark Lab(诺亚方舟实验室)

Tianbo Ji, Yvette Graham, Gareth J. F. Jones, Chenyang Lyu, Qun Liu

摘要:

开放域对话系统的评估是非常具有挑战性的,更好的技术的发展是一次又一次强调迫切需要。尽管在最近的比赛中进行了大量的努力来进行可靠的系统实时评估,但注释已被放弃,并被报道为太不可靠而无法产生合理的结果。这是一个严重的问题,因为不知道自动度量可以提供什么可能是或可能不是高质量对话的良好指示。在强调对话中迫切需要更好的评价技术的比赛中,我们提出了成功的发展,人类评价是高度可靠的,同时仍然保持可行性和低成本的求救信号。自我复制实验揭示了几乎完全可重复的结果与$r=0.969$的相关性。此外,由于缺乏适当的统计显着性检验方法,潜在的改进系统发生的可能性,由于机会很少考虑到对话评估,我们提出的评估促进了标准测试的应用。由于我们开发了一种高度可靠的评估方法,可以揭示系统性能的新见解。因此,我们包括一个比较国家的最先进的模型(i)与不使用人物角色,以衡量人物角色的对话质量的贡献,以及(ii)规定与自由选择的主题。有趣的是,关于人物角色,结果表明,人物角色并不像预期的那样对对话质量有积极的贡献。

英文摘要:

Evaluation of open-domain dialogue systems is highly challenging and development of better techniques is highlighted time and again as desperately needed. Despite substantial efforts to carry out reliable live evaluation of systems in recent competitions, annotations have been abandoned and reported as too unreliable to yield sensible results. This is a serious problem since automatic metrics are not known to provide a good indication of what may or may not be a high-quality conversation. Answering the distress call of competitions that have emphasized the urgent need for better evaluation techniques in dialogue, we present the successful development of human evaluation that is highly reliable while still remaining feasible and low cost. Self-replication experiments reveal almost perfectly repeatable results with a correlation of $r=0.969$. Furthermore, due to the lack of appropriate methods of statistical significance testing, the likelihood of potential improvements to systems occurring due to chance is rarely taken into account in dialogue evaluation, and the evaluation we propose facilitates application of standard tests. Since we have developed a highly reliable evaluation method, new insights into system performance can be revealed. We therefore include a comparison of state-of-the-art models (i) with and without personas, to measure the contribution of personas to conversation quality, as well as (ii) prescribed versus freely chosen topics. Interestingly with respect to personas, results indicate that personas do not positively contribute to conversation quality as expected.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑