arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.07302gr-qcphysics.hist-ph
收藏

因果关系和时间顺序--相对论和概率方面

Causality and time order -- relativistic and probabilistic aspects

Michał Eckstein, Michael Heller

摘要:

我们调查的时间和因果关系的线程在当代物理理论的结构,强调经验和操作方面。在J. Ehlers、F. Pirani和A. Schild和R. Penrose,S.W. Hawking,B.卡特和其他人,我们认为,目前的方式做相对论物理学的先决条件处理时间和因果关系作为原始的概念,他们都不是'更原始'比其他。关于哪些概念被假定为原始的,哪些陈述被视为公理的决定,取决于我们对整体进行思考的角度的选择。这个标准方法是基于这样一个前提,即点状粒子的概念是一个可行的近似。然而,这个假设并没有得到物理学的现实方法的支持,特别是量子理论。我们通过分析M. Eckstein和T.米勒他们考虑时空$M$上概率测度的空间$P(M)$,使得对于元素$μ\in P(M)$,数$μ(K)$指定与时空区域$K$和测度$μ$相关的某个事件发生的概率。这样,$M$就不应被视为时空事件的集合,而应被视为对应概率测度的支持。正如Eckstein和Miller所表明的,空间$P(M)$继承了来自底层时空的因果序,并促进了“概率测度的因果演化”的严格概念。我们看看这些作品中分析的时间和因果结构的演绎链,以突出其操作(或准操作)方面。如果不考虑相关实验中观察到的相对频率和相关性,这是不可能的。

英文摘要:

We investigate temporal and causal threads in the fabric of contemporary physical theories with an emphasis on empirical and operationalistic aspects. Building on the axiomatization of general relativity proposed by J. Ehlers, F. Pirani and A. Schild and the global space-time structure elaborated by R. Penrose, S.W. Hawking, B. Carter and others, we argue that the current way of doing relativistic physics presupposes treating time and causality as primitive concepts, neither of them being `more primitive' than the other. The decision regarding which concepts to assume as primitive and which statements to regard as axioms depends on the choice of the angle at which we contemplate the whole. This standard approach is based on the presupposition that the concept of a point-like particle is a viable approximation. However, this assumption is not supported by a realistic approach to doing physics and, in particular, by quantum theory. We remove this assumption by analysing the recent works by M. Eckstein and T. Miller. They consider the space $P(M)$ of probability measures on space-time $M$ such that, for an element $μ\in P(M)$, the number $μ(K)$ specifies the probability of the occurrence of some event associated with the space-time region $K$ and the measure $μ$. In this way, $M$ is not to be regarded as a collection of space-time events, but rather as a support for corresponding probability measures. As shown by Eckstein and Miller, the space $P(M)$ inherits the causal order from the underlying space-time and facilitates a rigorous notion of a `causal evolution of probability measures'. We look at the deductive chains creating temporal and causal structures analysed in these works, in order to highlight their operational (or quasi-operational) aspect. This is impossible without taking into account the relative frequencies and correlations observed in relevant experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑