arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2202.04801cs.LG
收藏

迈向有序:采用灵活建模方法的创伤性脑损伤后详细功能预后

The leap to ordinal: detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach

University of Cambridge(剑桥大学);Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);University of Stirling(斯特林大学);Leiden University Medical Center(莱顿大学医学中心);Karolinska Institutet(卡罗林斯卡学院)
Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Ioan Milosevic, Lindsay Wilson, David K. Menon, Robert D. Stevens, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David W. Nelson, Ari Ercole, the CENTER-TBI inve… 展开作者

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Ioan Milosevic, Lindsay Wilson, David K. Menon, Robert D. Stevens, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David W. Nelson, Ari Ercole, the CENTER-TBI investigators/participants

AI总结:

本研究基于CENTER-TBI的1,550例ICU患者,比较预测因子集与建模策略,构建可同时预测8个GOSE等级概率的有序预后模型,发现扩充关键预测因子比提高模型复杂度更有效。

摘要:

当创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在受伤后进入重症监护病房(ICU)时,早期预后对于基线风险调整和共同决策至关重要。TBI结局通常通过格拉斯哥预后量表扩展版(GOSE)被划分为受伤后6个月时功能恢复的8个有序等级。现有ICU预后模型预测GOSE某一阈值处的二分类结局(例如,生存预测[GOSE>1]或功能独立预测[GOSE>4])。我们旨在开发有序预测模型,以同时预测每个GOSE评分的概率。从Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI(CENTER-TBI)患者数据集ICU层的一项前瞻性队列(n=1,550,65个中心)中,我们提取了ICU入院24小时内的所有临床信息(1,151个预测因子)和6个月GOSE评分。我们分析了两个设计要素对有序模型性能的影响:(1)基线预测因子集,范围从包含10个经验证预测因子的精简集合,到所有可能预测因子的token嵌入表示;(2)建模策略,从有序逻辑回归到多项式深度学习。通过重复k折交叉验证,我们发现扩展基线预测因子集显著改善了有序预测性能,而增加分析复杂性则没有。这些提升中有一半可通过向精简集合添加8个高影响预测因子(2个人口统计学变量、4种蛋白质生物标志物和2项严重程度评估)实现。在最佳情况下,有序模型达到0.76(95% CI:0.74–0.77)的有序区分能力(有序c指数),并对6个月GOSE的有序变异实现57%(95% CI:54%–60%)的解释度(Somers' D)。我们的结果推动了对更高GOSE的信息性预测因子的搜索,以及有序动态预测模型的开发。

英文摘要:

When a patient is admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after a traumatic brain injury (TBI), an early prognosis is essential for baseline risk adjustment and shared decision making. TBI outcomes are commonly categorised by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) into 8, ordered levels of functional recovery at 6 months after injury. Existing ICU prognostic models predict binary outcomes at a certain threshold of GOSE (e.g., prediction of survival [GOSE>1] or functional independence [GOSE>4]). We aimed to develop ordinal prediction models that concurrently predict probabilities of each GOSE score. From a prospective cohort (n=1,550, 65 centres) in the ICU stratum of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) patient dataset, we extracted all clinical information within 24 hours of ICU admission (1,151 predictors) and 6-month GOSE scores. We analysed the effect of 2 design elements on ordinal model performance: (1) the baseline predictor set, ranging from a concise set of 10 validated predictors to a token-embedded representation of all possible predictors, and (2) the modelling strategy, from ordinal logistic regression to multinomial deep learning. With repeated k-fold cross-validation, we found that expanding the baseline predictor set significantly improved ordinal prediction performance while increasing analytical complexity did not. Half of these gains could be achieved with the addition of 8 high-impact predictors (2 demographic variables, 4 protein biomarkers, and 2 severity assessments) to the concise set. At best, ordinal models achieved 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77) ordinal discrimination ability (ordinal c-index) and 57% (95% CI: 54%-60%) explanation of ordinal variation in 6-month GOSE (Somers' D). Our results motivate the search for informative predictors for higher GOSE and the development of ordinal dynamic prediction models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑