arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.03786eess.SYcs.SY
收藏

电网边缘资源协调:系统综述与分类

Coordination of resources at the edge of the electricity grid: systematic review and taxonomy

Flora Charbonnier, Thomas Morstyn, Malcolm McCulloch

摘要:

本文提出了一种新的分类协调策略的分布式能源在电网的边缘,基于关键的文献趋势的系统分析。分布式能源的协调,如分散式发电和灵活性能源,对于电力脱碳和实现气候目标至关重要。关于这一专题的文献呈指数级增长;然而,迄今为止所用的术语含糊不清。我们试图通过将协调策略的类别综合在一种基于代理、信息和游戏类型的新型详尽、相互排斥的分类法中来解决这种缺乏清晰度的问题。这些概念在文献中的相关性通过使用结构化主题检索查询对84,741篇出版物进行系统性文献综述来说明。然后,93个选定的协调策略进行了更详细的分析,并映射到这个框架。明确结构假设是为能源系统内不同情况选择适当协调战略的关键。我们认为,需要多种互补战略来协调能源系统的不同组成部分,实现深度脱碳。

英文摘要:

This paper proposes a novel taxonomy of coordination strategies for distributed energy resources at the edge of the electricity grid, based on a systematic analysis of key literature trends. The coordination of distributed energy resources such as decentralised generation and flexibility sources is critical for decarbonising electricity and achieving climate goals. The literature on the topic is growing exponentially; however, there is ambiguity in the terminology used to date. We seek to resolve this lack of clarity by synthesising the categories of coordination strategies in a novel exhaustive, mutually exclusive taxonomy based on agency, information and game type. The relevance of these concepts in the literature is illustrated through a systematic literature review of 84,741 publications using a structured topic search query. Then 93 selected coordination strategies are analysed in more detail and mapped onto this framework. Clarity on structural assumptions is key for selecting appropriate coordination strategies for differing contexts within energy systems. We argue that a plurality of complementary strategies is needed to coordinate energy systems' different components and achieve deep decarbonisation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑