arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.13430quant-ph
收藏

计算假设下EPR对的并行自检验

Parallel self-testing of EPR pairs under computational assumptions

Honghao Fu, Daochen Wang, Qi Zhao

AI总结:

本工作提出首个在计算假设下对单个量子设备的N个EPR对进行并行自检验的协议,可测试任意计算基或Hadamard基测量分布,并支持设备无关量子密钥分发及云量子计算机的量子比特认证。

摘要:

自检验是量子力学的一个基本特性,它允许经典验证者强制不可信的量子设备制备特定状态并对其执行特定测量。标准方法假设至少有两个空间分离的设备。最近,Metger和Vidick [Quantum, 2021] 表明,在计算假设下,单个量子设备的单个EPR对可以被自检验。在本工作中,我们将他们的结果推广,首次在相同计算假设下的单设备设置中,对$N$个EPR对及其上的测量进行并行自检验。我们证明,一个诚实的量子设备使用poly$(N)$资源能以概率接近于1(可忽略差距)通过我们的协议。此外,我们证明,任何以概率至多$ε$未能通过我们协议的量子设备,必须在适当意义上poly$(N,ε)$-接近诚实。特别地,我们的协议可以测试计算基或Hadamard基测量张量积上的任何分布,使其适用于计算假设下的设备无关量子密钥分发等应用。此外,我们协议的简化版本是首个仅使用经典通信就能高效认证单个云量子计算机任意数量量子比特的协议。

英文摘要:

Self-testing is a fundamental feature of quantum mechanics that allows a classical verifier to force untrusted quantum devices to prepare certain states and perform certain measurements on them. The standard approach assumes at least two spatially separated devices. Recently, Metger and Vidick [Quantum, 2021] showed that a single EPR pair of a single quantum device can be self-tested under computational assumptions. In this work, we generalize their results to give the first parallel self-test of $N$ EPR pairs and measurements on them in the single-device setting under the same computational assumptions. We show that our protocol can be passed with probability negligibly close to $1$ by an honest quantum device using poly$(N)$ resources. Moreover, we show that any quantum device that fails our protocol with probability at most $ε$ must be poly$(N,ε)$-close to being honest in the appropriate sense. In particular, our protocol can test any distribution over tensor products of computational or Hadamard basis measurements, making it suitable for applications such as device-independent quantum key distribution under computational assumptions. Moreover, a simplified version of our protocol is the first that can efficiently certify an arbitrary number of qubits of a single cloud quantum computer using only classical communication.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑