arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.10474cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selection

University of Michigan(密歇根大学);University of New Mexico(新墨西哥大学);Emory University(埃默里大学);University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Allen Institute for AI(艾伦人工智能研究所)

Suchin Gururangan, Dallas Card, Sarah K. Dreier, Emily K. Gade, Leroy Z. Wang, Zeyu Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A. Smith

英文摘要:

Language models increasingly rely on massive web dumps for diverse text data. However, these sources are rife with undesirable content. As such, resources like Wikipedia, books, and newswire often serve as anchors for automatically selecting web text most suitable for language modeling, a process typically referred to as quality filtering. Using a new dataset of U.S. high school newspaper articles -- written by students from across the country -- we investigate whose language is preferred by the quality filter used for GPT-3. We find that newspapers from larger schools, located in wealthier, educated, and urban ZIP codes are more likely to be classified as high quality. We then demonstrate that the filter's measurement of quality is unaligned with other sensible metrics, such as factuality or literary acclaim. We argue that privileging any corpus as high quality entails a language ideology, and more care is needed to construct training corpora for language models, with better transparency and justification for the inclusion or exclusion of various texts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑