arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2109.09586cs.AIcs.CY
收藏

关于AI解释性的经验转向的一些批判和伦理观点

Some Critical and Ethical Perspectives on the Empirical Turn of AI Interpretability

Université Paris-Saclay(巴黎萨克雷大学)

Jean-Marie John-Mathews

摘要:

我们考虑了人工智能(AI)发展目前面临的两个基本和相关问题:缺乏道德和AI决策的可解释性。可解释的人工智能决策是否有助于解决人工智能中的道德问题?使用随机研究,我们的实验表明,生产的解释的经验和自由转向倾向于选择人工智能的解释与低谴责的力量。因此,在某些条件下,可解释性工具不是生产道德人工智能的手段,而是矛盾的障碍,因为它们可以给人一种对道德事件敏感的错觉。我们还表明,人工智能解释的谴责力量高度依赖于解释发生的背景,例如解释对象的性别或教育水平。因此,人工智能伦理工具有时过于灵活,通过自由生产解释进行自我监管似乎不足以解决伦理问题。然后,我们提出了伦理人工智能未来发展的两种情况:更多的外部监管或更多的人工智能解释自由化。这两条相反的道路将对伦理AI的未来发展发挥重要作用。

英文摘要:

We consider two fundamental and related issues currently faced by Artificial Intelligence (AI) development: the lack of ethics and interpretability of AI decisions. Can interpretable AI decisions help to address ethics in AI? Using a randomized study, we experimentally show that the empirical and liberal turn of the production of explanations tends to select AI explanations with a low denunciatory power. Under certain conditions, interpretability tools are therefore not means but, paradoxically, obstacles to the production of ethical AI since they can give the illusion of being sensitive to ethical incidents. We also show that the denunciatory power of AI explanations is highly dependent on the context in which the explanation takes place, such as the gender or education level of the person to whom the explication is intended for. AI ethics tools are therefore sometimes too flexible and self-regulation through the liberal production of explanations do not seem to be enough to address ethical issues. We then propose two scenarios for the future development of ethical AI: more external regulation or more liberalization of AI explanations. These two opposite paths will play a major role on the future development of ethical AI.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑