arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2107.07602stat.AP
收藏

两阶段流行病学研究中暴露量预测的最优设计域适应

Optimal-Design Domain-Adaptation for Exposure Prediction in Two-Stage Epidemiological Studies

Ron Sarafian, Itai Kloog, Jonathan D. Rosenblatt

摘要:

在两阶段研究的第一阶段,研究人员使用统计模型来估算未观察到的暴露。在第二阶段,估算的暴露作为流行病学模型的协变量。第一阶段中的插补误差作为第二阶段中的测量误差操作,并且因此使曝光效应估计产生偏差。本研究旨在通过第一阶段和第二阶段之间的信息共享来改善暴露效应的估计。我们估计量的核心是观察到,并非所有第二阶段的观察都同样重要。因此,我们借用最优实验设计理论的思想,以确定更重要的个体。然后,我们使用领域适应的机器学习文献中的思想来改进这些个体的估算。我们的模拟证实,暴露效应估计比目前的最佳实践更准确。实证证明得出PM对高血糖风险影响的估计值较小,置信区间较紧。环境科学家和流行病学家之间的信息共享可改善健康影响评估。我们的估计器是利用这种信息交换的原则性方法,并且可以应用于任何两阶段研究。

英文摘要:

In the first stage of a two-stage study, the researcher uses a statistical model to impute the unobserved exposures. In the second stage, imputed exposures serve as covariates in epidemiological models. Imputation error in the first stage operate as measurement errors in the second stage, and thus bias exposure effect estimates. This study aims to improve the estimation of exposure effects by sharing information between the first and second stage. At the heart of our estimator is the observation that not all second-stage observations are equally important to impute. We thus borrow ideas from the optimal-experimental-design theory, to identify individuals of higher importance. We then improve the imputation of these individuals using ideas from the machine-learning literature of domain-adaptation. Our simulations confirm that the exposure effect estimates are more accurate than the current best practice. An empirical demonstration yields smaller estimates of PM effect on hyperglycemia risk, with tighter confidence bands. Sharing information between environmental scientist and epidemiologist improves health effect estimates. Our estimator is a principled approach for harnessing this information exchange, and may be applied to any two stage study.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑