arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2104.09267physics.soc-ph
收藏

可能的疫苗损害的替代事实:28个欧洲国家疫苗接种信念的类型学

The alternative fact of probable vaccine damage A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries

Simona Nicoleta Vulpe, Cosima Rughinis

摘要:

背景:尽管缺乏科学支持,但疫苗犹豫是普遍存在的。虽然疫苗损害作为一个科学事实在统计上是非常罕见的,但新兴的社会和技术力量已经将可能的疫苗损害转化为另一种事实。研究方法:使用Eurobarometer 91.2对2019年3月采访的具有统计学代表性的欧盟27国-英国样本进行调查,我们记录了对疫苗风险的看法,并通过探索性聚类分析确定了关于疫苗有效性,安全性和有用性的三种信念配置。结果:公众对疫苗风险的信念是常见的。大约十分之一的欧盟27国-英国人口认为疫苗在授权前没有经过严格的测试,三分之一的人认为疫苗会使免疫系统过载或削弱免疫系统,并且会导致他们所保护的疾病,近一半的人认为疫苗会导致严重的副作用。我们确定了三种信念配置:怀疑,自信和权衡集群。怀疑型(大约。11%的欧盟27国-英国受访者)的定义是认为疫苗是相当无效的,受可能的疫苗损害的风险,没有经过良好的测试,和无用的;自信型(约11%)。59%)是由疫苗有效,安全,经过良好测试和有用的信念定义的;而权衡型(大约59%)是由疫苗有效,安全,经过良好测试和有用的信念定义的。29%的人认为疫苗是有效的,经过充分测试和有用的,同时认为疫苗可能会造成损害。结论:目前,疫苗可能造成的损害作为一种替代事实存在于公众的想象中,广泛的公众,包括那些信任医学科学的人,都可以感知到。

英文摘要:

Background: Despite lacking scientific support, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. While vaccine damage as a scientific fact is statistically highly uncommon, emerging social and technological forces have converted probable vaccine damage into an alternative fact. Methods: Using the Eurobarometer 91.2 survey on a statistically representative EU27-UK sample interviewed in March 2019, we documented perceptions of vaccine risks and identified three belief configurations regarding vaccine effectiveness, safety, and usefulness, through exploratory cluster analysis. Results: The public beliefs in vaccine risks are frequent. Approximatively one-tenth of the EU27-UK population consider vaccines are not rigorously tested before authorization, one-third believe vaccines can overload or weaken the immune system and that they can cause the disease against which they protect, and almost one-half believe vaccines can cause serious side effects. We identified three belief configurations: the skeptical, the confident, and the trade-off clusters. The skeptical type (approx. 11 percent of EU27-UK respondents) is defined by the belief that vaccines are rather ineffective, affected by risks of probable vaccine damage, not well-tested, and useless; the confident type (approx. 59 percent) is defined by beliefs that vaccines are effective, safe, well-tested, and useful; and the trade-off type (approx. 29 percent) combines beliefs that vaccines are effective, well-tested and useful, with beliefs of probable vaccine damage. Conclusions: Probable vaccine damage presently exists as an alternative fact in the public imagination, perceptively available for wide segments of the public, including those who trust medical science.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑