陆上、海上或涡轮机内电解？海上风力发电中心绿色制氢替代集成设计的技术经济概述
Onshore, offshore or in-turbine electrolysis? Techno-economic overview of alternative integration designs for green hydrogen production into Offshore Wind Power Hubs
摘要：
对海上风力发电的大规模投资对如何将这种电力整合到现有能源系统中产生了重大挑战。在这种情况下，海上风电产生的绿色氢气成为消除欧洲及其他地区实现无碳经济障碍的一个有前途的解决方案。受丹麦最近决定建造世界上第一个人工海上能源中心的发展的启发，本文研究了如何实现绿色氢的最低成本。提出了一个模型，提出了氢和海上电功率基础设施的综合设计，确定了氢和电的平准化成本。考虑到不同的电解槽位置，技术和操作模式的组合，从海上风力发电枢纽制氢的经济可行性进行评估。结果表明，海上绿色制氢的成本可降至每公斤2.4欧元，与目前天然气生产的氢气成本相比具有竞争力。此外，减少高达13%。当在海上安装电解槽以削减峰值负荷时，风力发电成本的10%被记录。
英文摘要：
Massive investments in offshore wind power generate significant challenges on how this electricity will be integrated into the incumbent energy systems. In this context, green hydrogen produced by offshore wind emerges as a promising solution to remove barriers towards a carbon-free economy in Europe and beyond. Motivated by the recent developments in Denmark with the decision to construct the world's first artificial Offshore Energy Hub, this paper investigates how the lowest cost for green hydrogen can be achieved. A model proposing an integrated design of the hydrogen and offshore electric power infrastructure, determining the levelised costs of both hydrogen and electricity, is proposed. The economic feasibility of hydrogen production from Offshore Wind Power Hubs is evaluated considering the combination of different electrolyser placements, technologies and modes of operations. The results show that costs down to 2.4 EUR per kg can be achieved for green hydrogen production offshore, competitive with the hydrogen costs currently produced by natural gas. Moreover, a reduction of up to 13 pct. of the cost of wind electricity is registered when an electrolyser is installed offshore shaving the peak loads.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
