arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2103.01059eess.AScs.SDeess.SP

Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely

Radboud University(拉德堡德大学);University of Kent(肯特大学)

Cong Zhang, Kathleen Jepson, Georg Lohfink, Amalia Arvaniti

英文摘要:

Face-to-face speech data collection has been next to impossible globally due to COVID-19 restrictions. To address this problem, simultaneous recordings of three repetitions of the cardinal vowels were made using a Zoom H6 Handy Recorder with external microphone (henceforth H6) and compared with two alternatives accessible to potential participants at home: the Zoom meeting application (henceforth Zoom) and two lossless mobile phone applications (Awesome Voice Recorder, and Recorder; henceforth Phone). F0 was tracked accurately by all devices; however, for formant analysis (F1, F2, F3) Phone performed better than Zoom, i.e. more similarly to H6, though data extraction method (VoiceSauce, Praat) also resulted in differences. In addition, Zoom recordings exhibited unexpected drops in intensity. The results suggest that lossless format phone recordings present a viable option for at least some phonetic studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑