综述了近年来太阳能、光伏和光热联合辅助的空气源热泵（ASHP）系统
A systematic review of recent air source heat pump (ASHP) systems assisted by solar thermal, photovoltaic and photovoltaic/thermal sources
摘要：
太阳能辅助的空气源热泵系统由于其在建筑中用于采暖、制冷和热水的可行性而受到广泛关注。然而，有各种各样的配置，参数和性能标准的太阳能辅助ASHP系统，导致一个主要的不一致性，增加了复杂程度的比较和实施不同的系统。缺乏比较文献综述，旨在评估来自三种主要太阳能来源的各种ASHP系统的性能，例如太阳能热（ST），光伏（PV）和混合光伏/热（PV/T）。因此，本文进行了系统的审查，目前的太阳能辅助ASHP系统，包括其边界条件，系统配置，性能指标，研究方法和系统性能。比较结果表明，PV-ASHP系统的技术经济性能最好，平均性能系数（COP）在3.75左右，但投资和回收期适中。而ST-ASHP和PV/T-ASHP系统的性能较低，平均COP分别为2.90和3.03。PV/T-ASHP系统的成本最高，投资回收期最长，ST-ASHP系统的成本最低。从方法学、系统优化和标准评估等方面探讨了未来的研究方向。
英文摘要：
The air source heat pump (ASHP) systems assisted by solar energy have drawn great attentions, owing to their great feasibility in buildings for space heating/cooling and hot water purposes. However, there are a variety of configurations, parameters and performance criteria of solar assisted ASHP systems, leading to a major inconsistency that increase the degree of complexity to compare and implement different systems. A comparative literature review is lacking, with the aim to evaluate the performance of various ASHP systems from three main solar sources, such as solar thermal (ST), photovoltaic (PV) and hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T). This paper thus conducts a systematic review of the prevailing solar assisted ASHP systems, including their boundary conditions, system configurations, performance indicators, research methodologies and system performance. The comparison result indicates that PV-ASHP system has the best techno-economic performance, which performs best in average with coefficient of performance (COP) of around 3.75, but with moderate cost and payback time. While ST-ASHP and PV/T-ASHP systems have lower performance with mean COP of 2.90 and 3.03, respectively. Moreover, PV/T-ASHP system has the highest cost and longest payback time, while ST-ASHP has the lowest ones. Future research are discussed from aspects of methodologies, system optimization and standard evaluation.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
