arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.02872cs.LGcs.ROstat.ML
收藏

模仿学习中的反馈:协变量偏移的三种方式

Feedback in Imitation Learning: The Three Regimes of Covariate Shift

Princeton(普林斯顿大学);Aurora Innovation(奥罗拉创新公司);Carnegie Mellon(卡内基梅隆大学)

Jonathan Spencer, Sanjiban Choudhury, Arun Venkatraman, Brian Ziebart, J. Andrew Bagnell

摘要:

模仿学习的实践者经常注意到,对先前行为的条件化策略导致学习者在原地的“坚持”错误和表现之间的巨大差异。互动的方法可以证明解决这个分歧,但需要反复查询的演示。最近的工作确定了这种分歧是源于一个“因果混淆”在预测当前的行动,并寻求消融因果方面的当前状态使用工具的因果推理。在这项工作中,我们认为,这种分歧只是协变量偏移的另一种表现形式,加剧了决策和输入功能之间的反馈设置。学习者通常依赖于对决策具有强预测性的特征,但这些特征受到强协变量偏移的影响。我们的工作证明了广泛的一类问题,这种转变可以减轻,理论上和实践中,利用模拟器,但没有任何进一步的查询专家演示。我们分析了现有的基准用于测试模仿学习的方法,并发现这些基准是可实现的和简单的,因此不足以捕捉更难的制度错误复合在现实世界中的决策问题。我们发现,在一个令人惊讶的对比与以前的文献,但与我们的理论相一致,天真的行为克隆提供了极好的结果。我们详细介绍了需要新的标准化基准,捕捉机器人问题中看到的现象。

英文摘要:

Imitation learning practitioners have often noted that conditioning policies on previous actions leads to a dramatic divergence between "held out" error and performance of the learner in situ. Interactive approaches can provably address this divergence but require repeated querying of a demonstrator. Recent work identifies this divergence as stemming from a "causal confound" in predicting the current action, and seek to ablate causal aspects of current state using tools from causal inference. In this work, we argue instead that this divergence is simply another manifestation of covariate shift, exacerbated particularly by settings of feedback between decisions and input features. The learner often comes to rely on features that are strongly predictive of decisions, but are subject to strong covariate shift. Our work demonstrates a broad class of problems where this shift can be mitigated, both theoretically and practically, by taking advantage of a simulator but without any further querying of expert demonstration. We analyze existing benchmarks used to test imitation learning approaches and find that these benchmarks are realizable and simple and thus insufficient for capturing the harder regimes of error compounding seen in real-world decision making problems. We find, in a surprising contrast with previous literature, but consistent with our theory, that naive behavioral cloning provides excellent results. We detail the need for new standardized benchmarks that capture the phenomena seen in robotics problems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑