arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.14983cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

Reducing conversational agents' overconfidence through linguistic calibration

Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);Facebook AI Research(脸书人工智能研究院)

Sabrina J. Mielke, Arthur Szlam, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau

英文摘要:

While improving neural dialogue agents' factual accuracy is the object of much research, another important aspect of communication, less studied in the setting of neural dialogue, is transparency about ignorance. In this work, we analyze to what extent state-of-the-art chit-chat models are linguistically calibrated in the sense that their verbalized expression of doubt (or confidence) matches the likelihood that the model's responses are factually incorrect (or correct). We find that these models are poorly calibrated, yet we show that likelihood of correctness can accurately be predicted. By incorporating such metacognitive features into the training of a controllable generation model, we obtain a dialogue agent with greatly improved linguistic calibration. While improving neural dialogue agents' factual accuracy is the object of much research, another important aspect of communication, less studied in the setting of neural dialogue, is transparency about ignorance. In this work, we analyze to what extent state-of-the-art chit-chat models are linguistically calibrated in the sense that their verbalized expression of doubt (or confidence) matches the likelihood that the model's responses are factually incorrect (or correct). We find that these models are poorly calibrated, yet we show that likelihood of correctness can accurately be predicted. By incorporating such metacognitive features into the training of a controllable generation model, we obtain a dialogue agent with greatly improved linguistic calibration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑