arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.14218math.NAcs.NA

无网格径向基函数配点法与有限元法求解 Poisson 和 Stokes 问题的比较

A Comparison Between Meshless Radial Basis Function Collocation Method and Finite Element Method for Solving Poisson and Stokes Problems

Ismet Karakan, Ceren Gürkan, Cem Avcı

AI总结:

本文比较了有限元法与无网格径向基函数配点法求解 Poisson 和 Stokes 问题的性能,通过形状参数优化和虚拟曲面体积误差计算等技术,从精度、运行时间、条件数和实现难度等方面评估了两种方法的适用准则。

摘要:

采用依赖网格的有限元法和无网格径向基函数配点法求解稳态与非稳态 Poisson 方程和 Stokes 方程,以在多个准则下比较这两种数值技术的性能。通过实施形状参数优化算法,提高了使用多重二次(multiquadrics)径向基函数的径向基函数配点法的精度。对于时间相关问题,使用向后欧拉法进行时间离散。性能评估依据精度、运行时间、条件数和实现难易程度等准则。计算了三类误差:最小二乘误差、均方根误差和最大相对误差。为在使用无网格径向基函数配点法时计算最小二乘误差,实现了一种新技术:创建虚拟数值解曲面,然后计算这些虚拟曲面与解析解曲面之间的体积,从而实现公平的误差计算。最后,将所有解汇总,并观察解节点数与运行时间、精度与运行时间以及精度与节点数之间的解趋势。评估结果表明了有限元法表现更好的准则条件,以及径向基函数配点法优于其依赖网格对应方法的准则条件。

英文摘要:

Steady and unsteady Poisson and Stokes equations are solved using mesh dependent Finite Element Method and meshless Radial Basis Function Collocation Method to compare the performances of these two numerical techniques across several criteria. The accuracy of Radial Basis Function Collocation Method with multiquadrics is enhanced by implementing a shape parameter optimization algorithm. For the time-dependent problems, time discretization is conducted using Backward Euler Method. The performances are assessed over the accuracy, runtime, condition number, and ease of implementation criteria. Three kinds of errors were calculated; least square error, root mean square error and maximum relative error. To calculate the least square error while using meshless Radial Basis Function Collocation Method, a novel technique is implemented. Imaginary numerical solution surfaces are created and then the volume between those imaginary surfaces and the analytic solution surfaces is calculated, enabling a fair error calculation. Lastly, all solutions are put together and solution trends are observed over the number of solution nodes vs. runtime, accuracy vs. runtime, and accuracy vs. the number of nodes. The assessment indicates the criteria under which Finite Element Method perform better and those when Radial Basis Function Collocation Method outperforms its mesh dependent counterpart.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑