arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.11349stat.MEstat.CO

广义贝叶斯推断中学习率选择方法的比较

A comparison of learning rate selection methods in generalized Bayesian inference

Pei-Shien Wu, Ryan Martin

AI总结:

本文在多种模型错误设定场景下,基于可信区间覆盖率等指标,直接对比了多种数据驱动的广义贝叶斯学习率选择方法,发现广义后验校准算法在覆盖率上通常表现更优。

摘要:

广义贝叶斯后验分布是通过在似然上施加分数幂,然后通过贝叶斯公式与先验结合而形成的。这个分数幂通常被视为对潜在模型错误设定偏差的补救措施,被称为学习率。近期文献中提出了许多数据驱动的学习率选择方法。每个提案都有不同的侧重点和旨在实现的不同目标,这使得它们难以进行比较。在本文中,我们在各种错误设定模型场景下,根据几个相关指标,特别是广义贝叶斯可信区间的覆盖率,对这些学习率选择方法进行了直接的正面对比。在某些示例中,所有方法都表现良好,而在另一些示例中,错误设定过于严重而无法克服,但我们发现所谓的广义后验校准算法在可信区间覆盖率方面往往优于其他方法。

英文摘要:

Generalized Bayes posterior distributions are formed by putting a fractional power on the likelihood before combining with the prior via Bayes's formula. This fractional power, which is often viewed as a remedy for potential model misspecification bias, is called the learning rate, and a number of data-driven learning rate selection methods have been proposed in the recent literature. Each of these proposals has a different focus, a different target they aim to achieve, which makes them difficult to compare. In this paper, we provide a direct head-to-head comparison of these learning rate selection methods in various misspecified model scenarios, in terms of several relevant metrics, in particular, coverage probability of the generalized Bayes credible regions. In some examples all the methods perform well, while in others the misspecification is too severe to be overcome, but we find that the so-called generalized posterior calibration algorithm tends to outperform the others in terms of credible region coverage probability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑