arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.00893cs.CLcs.LG
收藏

评价解释:教师的解释对学生有多大帮助?

Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Delhi Technological University(德里理工大学);Google Research(谷歌研究院)

Danish Pruthi, Rachit Bansal, Bhuwan Dhingra, Livio Baldini Soares, Michael Collins, Zachary C. Lipton, Graham Neubig, William W. Cohen

摘要:

虽然许多方法都声称通过突出显著特征来解释预测,但这些解释的目的是什么以及应该如何评估它们往往没有说明。在这项工作中,我们引入了一个框架来量化解释的价值,通过准确性增益,他们赋予一个学生模型训练模拟教师模型。至关重要的是,这些解释在培训期间对学生可用,但在考试时却不可用。与以前的建议相比,我们的方法是不容易被玩弄,使原则性的,自动的,模型不可知的评价属性。使用我们的框架,我们比较了文本分类和问答的众多归因方法,并观察到在不同的学生模型架构和学习策略之间一致(中度到高度)的定量差异。

英文摘要:

While many methods purport to explain predictions by highlighting salient features, what aims these explanations serve and how they ought to be evaluated often go unstated. In this work, we introduce a framework to quantify the value of explanations via the accuracy gains that they confer on a student model trained to simulate a teacher model. Crucially, the explanations are available to the student during training, but are not available at test time. Compared to prior proposals, our approach is less easily gamed, enabling principled, automatic, model-agnostic evaluation of attributions. Using our framework, we compare numerous attribution methods for text classification and question answering, and observe quantitative differences that are consistent (to a moderate to high degree) across different student model architectures and learning strategies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑