arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.08082astro-ph.CO
收藏

BeyondPlanck VII. 用于CMB实验的增益与绝对定标的贝叶斯估计

BeyondPlanck VII. Bayesian estimation of gain and absolute calibration for CMB experiments

E. Gjerløw, H. T. Ihle, S. Galeotta, K. J. Andersen, R. Aurlien, R. Banerji, M. Bersanelli, S. Bertocco, M. Brilenkov, M. Carbone, L. P. L. Colombo, H. K. Eriks… 展开作者

E. Gjerløw, H. T. Ihle, S. Galeotta, K. J. Andersen, R. Aurlien, R. Banerji, M. Bersanelli, S. Bertocco, M. Brilenkov, M. Carbone, L. P. L. Colombo, H. K. Eriksen, M. K. Foss, C. Franceschet, U. Fuskeland, M. Galloway, S. Gerakakis, B. Hensley, D. Herman, M. Iacobellis, M. Ieronymaki, J. B. Jewell, A. Karakci, E. Keihänen, R. Keskitalo, G. Maggio, D. Maino, M. Maris, S. Paradiso, B. Partridge, M. Reinecke, A. -S. Suur-Uski, T. L. Svalheim, D. Tavagnacco, H. Thommesen, D. J. Watts, I. K. Wehus, A. Zacchei

AI总结:

本研究在BeyondPlanck框架下提出CMB观测的贝叶斯定标算法,将增益分解为三项并通过吉布斯采样,应用于Planck LFI数据,结果与既往流程一致性良好且具备更好的跨频率一致性与WMAP契合度,可推广至其他实验。

摘要:

我们提出了一种应用于CMB(宇宙微波背景)观测的贝叶斯定标算法,该算法在全局端到端的BeyondPlanck(BP,超越普朗克)框架中实现,并将其应用于Planck低频仪器(LFI)数据。遵循最新的Planck分析方法,我们将完整的随时间变化的增益分解为三个正交分量之和:一个所有探测器共有的绝对定标项;一个可在不同探测器间变化的不随时间变化的项;以及一个允许在一小时指向周期之间变化的随时间变化的分量。随后,通过Gibbs采样(吉布斯采样),以全局信号模型中的所有其他参数为条件对每个项进行采样。绝对定标仅使用轨道偶极子作为参考源进行采样,而两个相对增益分量则使用全天信号进行采样,包括轨道和太阳CMB偶极子、CMB涨落以及前景贡献。我们讨论了影响增益估计的各类数据方面,包括偶极子/极化四极子简并以及仪器增益中的异常跳变。将我们的解与先前的处理流程进行比较,我们发现总体一致性良好:与Planck DR4(Planck 2018)相比,30 GHz的相对偏差为-0.67%(-0.84%),44 GHz为0.12%(-0.04%),70 GHz为-0.03%(-0.64%)。我们发现的偏差在预期误差范围内,并将其归因于不同处理流程之间数据使用和总体方法的差异。特别地,BP定标是全局执行的,从而带来了更好的频率间一致性。此外,WMAP(威尔金森微波各向异性探测器)观测数据被主动用于BP分析中,这打破了Planck数据集中的简并,并提升了与WMAP的一致性。尽管我们目前的阐述和算法面向LFI处理,但该流程完全可以推广到其他实验。

英文摘要:

We present a Bayesian calibration algorithm for CMB observations as implemented within the global end-to-end BeyondPlanck (BP) framework, and apply this to the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) data. Following the most recent Planck analysis, we decompose the full time-dependent gain into a sum of three orthogonal components: One absolute calibration term, common to all detectors; one time-independent term that can vary between detectors; and one time-dependent component that is allowed to vary between one-hour pointing periods. Each term is then sampled conditionally on all other parameters in the global signal model through Gibbs sampling. The absolute calibration is sampled using only the orbital dipole as a reference source, while the two relative gain components are sampled using the full sky signal, including the orbital and Solar CMB dipoles, CMB fluctuations, and foreground contributions. We discuss various aspects of the data that influence gain estimation, including the dipole/polarization quadrupole degeneracy and anomalous jumps in the instrumental gain. Comparing our solution to previous pipelines, we find good agreement in general, with relative deviations of -0.67% (-0.84%) for 30 GHz, 0.12% (-0.04%) for 44 GHz and -0.03% (-0.64%) for 70 GHz, compared to Planck DR4 (Planck 2018). The deviations we find are within expected error bounds, and we attribute them to differences in data usage and general approach between the pipelines. In particular, the BP calibration is performed globally, resulting in better inter-frequency consistency. Additionally, WMAP observations are used actively in the BP analysis, which breaks degeneracies in the Planck data set and results in better agreement with WMAP. Although our presentation and algorithm are currently oriented toward LFI processing, the procedure is fully generalizable to other experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑