arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.03623cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

特征去除是模型解释方法的统一原则

Feature Removal Is a Unifying Principle for Model Explanation Methods

University of Washington(华盛顿大学);Microsoft Research(微软研究院)

Ian Covert, Scott Lundberg, Su-In Lee

摘要:

研究人员已经提出了各种各样的模型解释方法,但仍然不清楚大多数方法是如何相关的,或者一种方法何时优于另一种方法。我们研究了文献,发现许多方法都是基于一个共同的原则,即通过删除来解释-本质上,测量从模型中删除特征集的影响。这些方法在几个方面有所不同,因此我们开发了一个基于移除的解释框架,该框架沿着三个维度来描述每个方法:1)该方法如何移除特征,2)该方法解释的模型行为,以及3)该方法如何总结每个特征的影响。我们的框架统一了26种现有的方法,包括几种最广泛使用的方法(SHAP,LIME,有意义的扰动,排列测试)。揭示这些方法之间的基本相似性使用户能够推理使用哪些工具,并为正在进行的模型可解释性研究提出了有希望的方向。

英文摘要:

Researchers have proposed a wide variety of model explanation approaches, but it remains unclear how most methods are related or when one method is preferable to another. We examine the literature and find that many methods are based on a shared principle of explaining by removing - essentially, measuring the impact of removing sets of features from a model. These methods vary in several respects, so we develop a framework for removal-based explanations that characterizes each method along three dimensions: 1) how the method removes features, 2) what model behavior the method explains, and 3) how the method summarizes each feature's influence. Our framework unifies 26 existing methods, including several of the most widely used approaches (SHAP, LIME, Meaningful Perturbations, permutation tests). Exposing the fundamental similarities between these methods empowers users to reason about which tools to use, and suggests promising directions for ongoing model explainability research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑