arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.02373cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

镜像学习:策略优化的统一框架

Mirror Learning: A Unifying Framework of Policy Optimisation

University of Oxford(牛津大学)

Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Christian Schroeder de Witt, Jakob Foerster

AI总结:

本文提出镜像学习这一统一理论框架,为TRPO和PPO等一大类算法提供理论保证,表明其经验成功源于理论性质而非近似类比,从而为探索理论上可靠的新型强化学习算法开辟了新方向。

摘要:

现代深度强化学习(RL)算法受广义策略迭代(GPI)或信赖域学习(TRL)框架的驱动。然而,严格遵循这些理论框架的算法已被证明难以扩展。令人惊讶的是,唯一已知的可扩展算法违反了GPI/TRL的假设,例如由于所需的正则化或其他启发式方法。目前对其经验成功的解释本质上是“类比式”的:它们被视为理论上可靠方法的近似改编。不幸的是,研究表明,在实践中这些算法与其概念上的祖先差异很大。相比之下,在本文中我们引入了一个新的理论框架,名为镜像学习(Mirror Learning),它为一大类算法提供了理论保证,包括TRPO和PPO。虽然后两者利用了我们框架的灵活性,但GPI和TRL仅作为其中病态限制性的特例而存在。这表明最先进方法的经验性能是其理论性质的直接结果,而非上述近似类比的产物。镜像学习使我们能够自由地大胆探索新颖的、理论上可靠的RL算法,这是一个迄今未知的奇妙领域。

英文摘要:

Modern deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are motivated by either the generalised policy iteration (GPI) or trust-region learning (TRL) frameworks. However, algorithms that strictly respect these theoretical frameworks have proven unscalable. Surprisingly, the only known scalable algorithms violate the GPI/TRL assumptions, e.g. due to required regularisation or other heuristics. The current explanation of their empirical success is essentially "by analogy": they are deemed approximate adaptations of theoretically sound methods. Unfortunately, studies have shown that in practice these algorithms differ greatly from their conceptual ancestors. In contrast, in this paper we introduce a novel theoretical framework, named Mirror Learning, which provides theoretical guarantees to a large class of algorithms, including TRPO and PPO. While the latter two exploit the flexibility of our framework, GPI and TRL fit in merely as pathologically restrictive corner cases thereof. This suggests that the empirical performance of state-of-the-art methods is a direct consequence of their theoretical properties, rather than of aforementioned approximate analogies. Mirror learning sets us free to boldly explore novel, theoretically sound RL algorithms, a thus far uncharted wonderland.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑