arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2010.04591stat.MLcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
收藏

Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression for Probabilistic States Estimation and Forecasting in Power Grids

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory(太平洋西北国家实验室);University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校)

Tong Ma, David Alonso Barajas-Solano, Ramakrishna Tipireddy, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky

英文摘要:

Real-time state estimation and forecasting is critical for efficient operation of power grids. In this paper, a physics-informed Gaussian process regression (PhI-GPR) method is presented and used for probabilistic forecasting and estimating the phase angle, angular speed, and wind mechanical power of a three-generator power grid system using sparse measurements. In standard data-driven Gaussian process regression (GPR), parameterized models for the prior statistics are fit by maximizing the marginal likelihood of observed data, whereas in PhI-GPR, we compute the prior statistics by solving stochastic equations governing power grid dynamics. The short-term forecast of a power grid system dominated by wind generation is complicated by the stochastic nature of the wind and the resulting uncertain mechanical wind power. Here, we assume that the power-grid dynamic is governed by the swing equations, and we treat the unknown terms in the swing equations (specifically, the mechanical wind power) as random processes, which turns these equations into stochastic differential equations. We solve these equations for the mean and variance of the power grid system using the Monte Carlo simulations method. We demonstrate that the proposed PhI-GPR method can accurately forecast and estimate both observed and unobserved states, including the mean behavior and associated uncertainty. For observed states, we show that PhI-GPR provides a forecast comparable to the standard data-driven GPR, with both forecasts being significantly more accurate than the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) forecast. We also show that the ARIMA forecast is much more sensitive to observation frequency and measurement errors than the PhI-GPR forecast.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑