arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.05892stat.ME
收藏

通过投注进行交互式排名测试

Interactive rank testing by betting

Boyan Duan, Aaditya Ramdas, Larry Wasserman

摘要:

为了在有协变量的随机化实验中检验治疗是否明显不同于安慰剂,采用了基于观察/残差秩的经典非参数检验(例如:Rosenbaum),通过排列实现了有限样本有效推断。本文提出了一个不同的原则基础上的推理:如果-访问所有的协变量和结果,但没有访问任何治疗分配-一个可以形成一个排名的主题是充分非随机的(例如:主要治疗其次是主要控制),那么我们可以自信地得出结论,必须有一个处理效应。基于这一原则的一个更微妙、更可量化的版本,我们设计了一个名为i-bet的交互式测试:分析师一次一个元素地形成一个单一的受试者排列,在每一步,分析师都用玩具钱打赌这个受试者是否真的得到了治疗,然后立即得知真相。财富过程形成了一个反对全局因果空值的实值证据度量,如果财富穿过$1/α$,我们可以在$α$层拒绝空值。除了提供一个新的“博弈论”原则,在此基础上的因果结论,i-bet有其他统计和计算的好处,例如(A)允许人类适应性地设计检验统计量的基础上不断增加的数据量被揭示(连同任何工作因果模型和先验知识),以及(B)不需要置换响应,而是注意到在空值下,财富形成一个非负鞅,上述决策规则的1型误差控制由Ville的紧不等式得出。此外,如果空值没有被拒绝,则稍后可以添加新的受试者,并且可以简单地继续测试,而无需任何校正(与置换p值不同)。

英文摘要:

In order to test if a treatment is perceptibly different from a placebo in a randomized experiment with covariates, classical nonparametric tests based on ranks of observations/residuals have been employed (eg: by Rosenbaum), with finite-sample valid inference enabled via permutations. This paper proposes a different principle on which to base inference: if -- with access to all covariates and outcomes, but without access to any treatment assignments -- one can form a ranking of the subjects that is sufficiently nonrandom (eg: mostly treated followed by mostly control), then we can confidently conclude that there must be a treatment effect. Based on a more nuanced, quantifiable, version of this principle, we design an interactive test called i-bet: the analyst forms a single permutation of the subjects one element at a time, and at each step the analyst bets toy money on whether that subject was actually treated or not, and learns the truth immediately after. The wealth process forms a real-valued measure of evidence against the global causal null, and we may reject the null at level $α$ if the wealth ever crosses $1/α$. Apart from providing a fresh "game-theoretic" principle on which to base the causal conclusion, the i-bet has other statistical and computational benefits, for example (A) allowing a human to adaptively design the test statistic based on increasing amounts of data being revealed (along with any working causal models and prior knowledge), and (B) not requiring permutation resampling, instead noting that under the null, the wealth forms a nonnegative martingale, and the type-1 error control of the aforementioned decision rule follows from a tight inequality by Ville. Further, if the null is not rejected, new subjects can later be added and the test can be simply continued, without any corrections (unlike with permutation p-values).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑