arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.08580physics.flu-dyn
收藏

对称性和turbulence建模。进行严格审查

Symmetries and turbulence modeling. A critical examination

George Khujadze, Michael Frewer

摘要:

Klingenberg,Oberlack和Pluemacher(2020)最近的研究提出了一种新的湍流建模策略。一个概念的证明,其中提出了一个空间演变的湍流平面射流的特定的流动配置,得出的结论是,他们的模型可以产生超越经典的缩放律。然而,我们的评论表明,他们的概念证明是有缺陷的,他们新提出的标度律并没有超越任何经典的解决方案。因此,他们建立了一个新的和更先进的湍流模型的论点不能得到证实。这个问题已经植根于建模策略本身,因为非物理统计缩放对称得到实现。打破这种对称性将恢复内部的一致性,并将所有的自相似解决方案回到经典的。值得注意的是,他们的模型还包括第二种非物理对称性。其中一位作者已经在以前出版的勘误表(Sadeghi,Oberlack和Gauding,2020)中承认了湍流射流的这一事实。然而,没有引用勘误表,因此读者没有意识到他们的方法存在导致不一致和相互冲突的结果的基本问题。相反,同样的非物理对称性再次发表。然而,这种不科学的行为并没有得到纠正,而是在随后的进一步误导性出版物Klingenberg & Oberlack(2022)中重复和继续,并在附录中的更新中进行了审查。

英文摘要:

The recent study by Klingenberg, Oberlack & Pluemacher (2020) proposes a new strategy for modeling turbulence in general. A proof-of-concept is presented therein for the particular flow configuration of a spatially evolving turbulent planar jet flow, coming to the conclusion that their model can generate scaling laws which go beyond the classical ones. Our comment, however, shows that their proof-of-concept is flawed and that their newly proposed scaling laws do not go beyond any classical solutions. Hence, their argument of having established a new and more advanced turbulence model cannot be confirmed. The problem is already rooted in the modeling strategy itself, in that a nonphysical statistical scaling symmetry gets implemented. Breaking this symmetry will restore the internal consistency and will turn all self-similar solutions back to the classical ones. To note is that their model also includes a second nonphysical symmetry. One of the authors already acknowledged this fact for turbulent jet flow in a formerly published Corrigendum (Sadeghi, Oberlack & Gauding, 2020). However, the Corrigendum is not cited and so the reader is not made aware that their method has fundamental problems that lead to inconsistencies and conflicting results. Instead, the very same nonphysical symmetry gets published again. Yet, this unscientific behaviour is not corrected, but repeated and continued in the subsequent and further misleading publication Klingenberg & Oberlack (2022), which is examined in this update in the appendix.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑