arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.15508physics.soc-ph
收藏

社会影响对群体智慧的模糊作用:一种分析方法

The ambiguous role of social influence on the wisdom of crowds: An analytic approach

Pavlin Mavrodiev, Frank Schweitzer

摘要:

“群体智慧”是指一群人对某个问题的平均意见可能非常接近真实答案的现象。它需要一个大的群体的意见多样性,但集体误差,平均意见和真实价值之间的差异,必须很小。我们考虑一个随机的观点动力学,个人可以改变他们的意见的基础上,其他人的意见(社会影响$α$),但在一定程度上也坚持自己的初始意见(个人信念$β$)。然后,我们推导出解析表达式的动态的集体错误和组的多样性。我们分析了他们的长期行为,以确定两个参数$(α,β)$和初始意见分布对群体智慧的影响。这使我们能够量化社会影响力的模糊作用:只有当最初的集体错误很大时,它才有助于提高群体的智慧,但在大多数情况下,它会恶化结果。在这些情况下,个人的信念仍然提高了群体的智慧,因为它减轻了社会影响的影响。

英文摘要:

"Wisdom of crowds" refers to the phenomenon that the average opinion of a group of individuals on a given question can be very close to the true answer. It requires a large group diversity of opinions, but the collective error, the difference between the average opinion and the true value, has to be small. We consider a stochastic opinion dynamics where individuals can change their opinion based on the opinions of others (social influence $α$), but to some degree also stick to their initial opinion (individual conviction $β$). We then derive analytic expressions for the dynamics of the collective error and the group diversity. We analyze their long-term behavior to determine the impact of the two parameters $(α,β)$ and the initial opinion distribution on the wisdom of crowds. This allows us to quantify the ambiguous role of social influence: only if the initial collective error is large, it helps to improve the wisdom of crowds, but in most cases it deteriorates the outcome. In these cases, individual conviction still improves the wisdom of crowds because it mitigates the impact of social influence.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑