arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2006.06776econ.TH
收藏

受限分配机制中的激励与效率

Incentives and Efficiency in Constrained Allocation Mechanisms

University of Chicago(芝加哥大学);Washington University in St. Louis(圣路易斯华盛顿大学)

Joseph Root, David S. Ahn

AI总结:

研究一般约束下的私人物品分配,证明两人防策略机制为局部独裁,N人群体防策略机制包含局部独裁边际机制,为房屋分配、室友匹配等问题提供统一见解,并应用于任务分配与网络规制。

摘要:

我们研究一般约束下的私人物品分配问题。若干著名例子是其特例,包括房屋分配、室友匹配、社会选择和多重分配。每个个体防策略且帕累托有效的两人机制都是“局部独裁”。每个群体防策略的N人机制都有作为局部独裁的两人边际机制。这些结果为已知刻画提供了新刻画和统一见解。我们找出了室友问题的所有群体防策略且帕累托有效的机制。我们给出了多重分配的相关结果。我们证明了Gibbard-Satterthwaite定理并给出了部分逆命题。我们还将刻画应用于任务分配和网络规制问题。

英文摘要:

We study private-good allocation under general constraints. Several prominent examples are special cases, including house allocation, roommate matching, social choice, and multiple assignment. Every individually strategy-proof and Pareto efficient two-agent mechanism is a "local dictatorship." Every group strategy-proof N-agent mechanism has two-agent marginal mechanisms that are local dictatorships. These results yield new characterizations and unifying insights for known characterizations. We find all group strategy-proof and Pareto efficient mechanisms for the roommates problem. We give a related result for multiple assignment. We prove the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem and give a partial converse. We also apply our characterization to task allocation and network regulation problems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑