arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.12656eess.AS
收藏

一种面向以儿童为中心的全天录音的开源语音类型分类器

An open-source voice type classifier for child-centered daylong recordings

Marvin Lavechin, Ruben Bousbib, Hervé Bredin, Emmanuel Dupoux, Alejandrina Cristia

AI总结:

本文提出一个开源神经网络语音类型分类器,结合SincNet与循环层,在260小时、10种语言的儿童中心录音上训练,性能大幅超越现有LENA系统,可用于语言习得研究和早期诊断。

摘要:

在真实世界环境中(例如以儿童为中心的录音中)的自发对话已被证明是最难处理的音频文件之一。尽管如此,构建能够应对如此多样条件的语音处理模型,对于语言习得研究将特别有用,因为研究人员关注儿童听到和产生的语音的数量与质量,同时也有助于早期诊断和测量干预效果。在本文中,我们介绍了我们设计一个开源神经网络的方法,该网络用于将音频片段分类为佩戴录音设备的儿童发出的发声、其他儿童发出的发声、成年男性语音和成年女性语音。为此,我们收集了多样化的以儿童为中心的语料库,总计达260小时的录音,覆盖10种语言。我们的模型可以用作下游任务的输入,例如估计成人说话者产生的单词数量,或儿童产生的语言单位数量。我们的架构将SincNet滤波器与一叠循环层相结合,并以较大幅度优于目前最先进的系统——已在众多儿童语言研究中使用的Language ENvironment Analysis(LENA)系统。

英文摘要:

Spontaneous conversations in real-world settings such as those found in child-centered recordings have been shown to be amongst the most challenging audio files to process. Nevertheless, building speech processing models handling such a wide variety of conditions would be particularly useful for language acquisition studies in which researchers are interested in the quantity and quality of the speech that children hear and produce, as well as for early diagnosis and measuring effects of remediation. In this paper, we present our approach to designing an open-source neural network to classify audio segments into vocalizations produced by the child wearing the recording device, vocalizations produced by other children, adult male speech, and adult female speech. To this end, we gathered diverse child-centered corpora which sums up to a total of 260 hours of recordings and covers 10 languages. Our model can be used as input for downstream tasks such as estimating the number of words produced by adult speakers, or the number of linguistic units produced by children. Our architecture combines SincNet filters with a stack of recurrent layers and outperforms by a large margin the state-of-the-art system, the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) that has been used in numerous child language studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑