The similarity between a pair of time series, i.e., sequences of indexed values in time order, is often estimated by the dynamic time warping (DTW) distance, instead of any in the well-studied family of measures including the longest common subsequence (LCS) length and the edit distance. Although it may seem as if the DTW and the LCS(-like) measures are essentially different, we reveal that the DTW distance can be represented by the longest increasing subsequence (LIS) length of a sequence of integers, which is the LCS length between the integer sequence and itself sorted. For a given pair of time series of length $n$ such that the dissimilarity between any elements is an integer between zero and $c$, we propose an integer sequence that represents any substring-substring DTW distance as its band-substring LIS length. The length of the produced integer sequence is $O(c n^2)$, which can be translated to $O(n^2)$ for constant dissimilarity functions. To demonstrate that techniques developed under the LCS(-like) measures are directly applicable to analysis of time series via our reduction of DTW to LIS, we present time-efficient algorithms for DTW-related problems utilizing the semi-local sequence comparison technique developed for LCS-related problems.
New algorithm for finding longest increasing subsequence is discussed. This algorithm is based on the ideas of idempotent mathematics and uses Max-Plus idempotent semiring. Problem of finding longest increasing sub- sequence is reformulated in a matrix form and solved with linear algebra.
Given a string $T$ with length $n$ whose characters are drawn from an ordered alphabet of size $σ$, its longest Lyndon subsequence is a longest subsequence of $T$ that is a Lyndon word. We propose algorithms for finding such a subsequence in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ space, or online in $O(n^3 σ)$ space and time. Our first result can be extended to find the longest common Lyndon subsequence of two strings of length $n$ in $O(n^4 σ)$ time using $O(n^3)$ space.
This paper reformulates the problem of finding a longest common increasing subsequence of the two given input sequences in a very succinct way. An extremely simple linear space algorithm based on the new formula can find a longest common increasing subsequence of sizes $n$ and $m$ respectively, in time $O(nm)$ using additional $\min\{n,m\}+1$ space.
We present an algorithm computing the longest periodic subsequence of a string of length $n$ in $O(n^7)$ time with $O(n^4)$ words of space. We obtain improvements when restricting the exponents or extending the search allowing the reported subsequence to be subperiodic down to $O(n^3)$ time and $O(n^2)$ words of space.
We present the first $\mathrm{o}(n)$-space polynomial-time algorithm for computing the length of a longest common subsequence. Given two strings of length $n$, the algorithm runs in $\mathrm{O}(n^{3})$ time with $\mathrm{O}\left(\frac{n \log^{1.5} n}{2^{\sqrt{\log n}}}\right)$ bits of space.
This note provides very simple, efficient algorithms for computing the number of distinct longest common subsequences of two input strings and for computing the number of LCS embeddings.
In this paper, we construct a data structure to efficiently compute the longest increasing subsequence of a sequence subject to dynamic updates. Our data structure supports a query for the longest increasing subsequence in $O(r+\log n)$ worst-case time and supports inserts anywhere in the sequence in $O \left(r\log{n/r}\right)$ worst-case time (where $r$ is the length of the longest increasing subsequence). The same data structure with a minor modification supports $O(\log n)$ worst-case time insertions if the insertions are performed at the end of the sequence. The data structure presented ca…
We present a practical algorithm for the cyclic longest common subsequence (CLCS) problem that runs in O(mn) time, where m and n are the lengths of the two input strings. While this is not necessarily an asymptotic improvement over the existing record, it is far simpler to understand and to implement.
The Longest Common Increasing Subsequence (LCIS) is a variant of the classical Longest Common Subsequence (LCS), in which we additionally require the common subsequence to be strictly increasing. While the well-known "Four Russians" technique can be used to find LCS in subquadratic time, it does not seem applicable to LCIS. Recently, Duraj [STACS 2020] used a completely different method based on the combinatorial properties of LCIS to design an $\mathcal{O}(n^2(\log\log n)^2/\log^{1/6}n)$ time algorithm. We show that an approach based on exploiting tabulation can be used to construct an asympt…
The {\em longest common subsequence (LCS)} problem is a classic and well-studied problem in computer science. Palindrome is a word which reads the same forward as it does backward. The {\em longest common palindromic subsequence (LCPS)} problem is an interesting variant of the classic LCS problem which finds the longest common subsequence between two given strings such that the computed subsequence is also a palindrome. In this paper, we study the LCPS problem and give efficient algorithms to solve this problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to study and solve this in…
The longest square subsequence (LSS) problem consists of computing a longest subsequence of a given string $S$ that is a square, i.e., a longest subsequence of form $XX$ appearing in $S$. It is known that an LSS of a string $S$ of length $n$ can be computed using $O(n^2)$ time [Kosowski 2004], or with (model-dependent) polylogarithmic speed-ups using $O(n^2 (\log \log n)^2 / \log^2 n)$ time [Tiskin 2013]. We present the first algorithm for LSS whose running time depends on other parameters, i.e., we show that an LSS of $S$ can be computed in $O(r \min\{n, M\}\log \frac{n}{r} + n + M \log n)$ t…
The {\em longest common subsequence (LCS)} problem is a classic and well-studied problem in computer science. LCS is a central problem in stringology and finds broad applications in text compression, error-detecting codes and biological sequence comparison. However, in numerous contexts, words represent cyclic sequences of symbols and LCS must be generalized to consider all circular shifts of the strings. This occurs especially in computational biology when genetic material is sequenced form circular DNA or RNA molecules. This initiates the problem of {\em longest common cyclic subsequence (LC…
Given a sequence of integers, we want to find a longest increasing subsequence of the sequence. It is known that this problem can be solved in $O(n \log n)$ time and space. Our goal in this paper is to reduce the space consumption while keeping the time complexity small. For $\sqrt{n} \le s \le n$, we present algorithms that use $O(s \log n)$ bits and $O(\frac{1}{s} \cdot n^{2} \cdot \log n)$ time for computing the length of a longest increasing subsequence, and $O(\frac{1}{s} \cdot n^{2} \cdot \log^{2} n)$ time for finding an actual subsequence. We also show that the time complexity of our al…
The Longest Common Subsequence Problem (LCS) deals with finding the longest subsequence among a given set of strings. The LCS problem is an NP-hard problem which makes it a target for lots of effort to find a better solution with heuristics methods. The baseline for most famous heuristics functions is a tabular random, probabilistic approach. This approach approximates the length of the LCS in each iteration. The combination of beam search and tabular probabilistic-based heuristics has led to a large number of proposals and achievements in algorithms for solving the LCS problem. In this work, …
We study the problem of computing a longest increasing subsequence in a sequence $S$ of $n$ distinct elements in the presence of persistent comparison errors. In this model, every comparison between two elements can return the wrong result with some fixed (small) probability $ p $, and comparisons cannot be repeated. Computing the longest increasing subsequence exactly is impossible in this model, therefore, the objective is to identify a subsequence that (i) is indeed increasing and (ii) has a length that approximates the length of the longest increasing subsequence. We present asymptotically…
The Longest Common Increasing Subsequence problem (LCIS) is a natural variant of the celebrated Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem. For LCIS, as well as for LCS, there is an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm and a SETH-based conditional lower bound of $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$. For LCS, there is also the Masek-Paterson $O(n^2 / \log{n})$-time algorithm, which does not seem to adapt to LCIS in any obvious way. Hence, a natural question arises: does any (slightly) sub-quadratic algorithm exist for the Longest Common Increasing Subsequence problem? We answer this question positively, presenting a $O(n^2…
At CPM 2017, Castelli et al. define and study a new variant of the Longest Common Subsequence Problem, termed the Longest Filled Common Subsequence Problem (LFCS). For the LFCS problem, the input consists of two strings $A$ and $B$ and a multiset of characters $\mathcal{M}$. The goal is to insert the characters from $\mathcal{M}$ into the string $B$, thus obtaining a new string $B^*$, such that the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) between $A$ and $B^*$ is maximized. Casteli et al. show that the problem is NP-hard and provide a 3/5-approximation algorithm for the problem. In this paper we study…
In the area of Pattern Recognition and Matching, finding a Longest Common Subsequence plays an important role. In this paper, we have proposed one algorithm based on parallel computation. We have used OpenMP API package as middleware to send the data to different processors. We have tested our algorithm in a system having four processors and 2 GB physical memory. The best result showed that the parallel algorithm increases the performance (speed of computation) by 3.22.
We consider the problem of identifying tandem scattered subsequences within a string. Our algorithm identifies a longest subsequence which occurs twice without overlap in a string. This algorithm is based on the Hunt-Szymanski algorithm, therefore its performance improves if the string is not self similar. This occurs naturally on strings over large alphabets. Our algorithm relies on new results for data structures that support dynamic longest increasing sub-sequences. In the process we also obtain improved algorithms for the decremental string comparison problem.
The 2-LCPS problem, first introduced by Chowdhury et al. [Fundam. Inform., 129(4):329-340, 2014], asks one to compute (the length of) a longest palindromic common subsequence between two given strings $A$ and $B$. We show that the 2-LCPS problem is at least as hard as the well-studied longest common subsequence problem for four strings (the 4-LCS problem). Then, we present a new algorithm which solves the 2-LCPS problem in $O(σM^2 + n)$ time, where $n$ denotes the length of $A$ and $B$, $M$ denotes the number of matching positions between $A$ and $B$, and $σ$ denotes the number of distinct cha…
We consider the longest common subsequence (LCS) problem with the restriction that the common subsequence is required to consist of at least $k$ length substrings. First, we show an $O(mn)$ time algorithm for the problem which gives a better worst-case running time than existing algorithms, where $m$ and $n$ are lengths of the input strings. Furthermore, we mainly consider the LCS in at least $k$ length order-isomorphic substrings problem. We show that the problem can also be solved in $O(mn)$ worst-case time by an easy-to-implement algorithm.
Finding the longest common subsequence in $k$-length substrings (LCS$k$) is a recently proposed problem motivated by computational biology. This is a generalization of the well-known LCS problem in which matching symbols from two sequences $A$ and $B$ are replaced with matching non-overlapping substrings of length $k$ from $A$ and $B$. We propose several algorithms for LCS$k$, being non-trivial incarnations of the major concepts known from LCS research (dynamic programming, sparse dynamic programming, tabulation). Our algorithms make use of a linear-time and linear-space preprocessing finding …
This paper shows that a simple algorithm produces the {\em all-prefixes-LCSs-graph} in $O(mn)$ time for two input sequences of size $m$ and $n$. Given any prefix $p$ of the first input sequence and any prefix $q$ of the second input sequence, all longest common subsequences (LCSs) of $p$ and $q$ can be generated in time proportional to the output size, once the all-prefixes-LCSs-graph has been constructed. The problem can be solved in the context of generating all the distinct character strings that represent an LCS or in the context of generating all ways of embedding an LCS in the two input …
Given a pair of strings, the problems of computing their Longest Common Subsequence and Edit Distance have been extensively studied for decades. For exact algorithms, LCS and Edit Distance (with character insertions and deletions) are equivalent; the state of the art running time is (almost) quadratic and this is tight under plausible fine-grained complexity assumptions. But for approximation algorithms the picture is different: there is a long line of works with improved approximation factors for Edit Distance, but for LCS (with binary strings) only a trivial $1/2$-approximation was known. In…
A heapable sequence is a sequence of numbers that can be arranged in a "min-heap data structure". Finding a longest heapable subsequence of a given sequence was proposed by Byers, Heeringa, Mitzenmacher, and Zervas (ANALCO 2011) as a generalization of the well-studied longest increasing subsequence problem and its complexity still remains open. An equivalent formulation of the longest heapable subsequence problem is that of finding a maximum-sized binary tree in a given permutation directed acyclic graph (permutation DAG). In this work, we study parameterized algorithms for both longest heapab…
Longest Run Subsequence is a problem introduced recently in the context of the scaffolding phase of genome assembly (Schrinner et al., WABI 2020). The problem asks for a maximum length subsequence of a given string that contains at most one run for each symbol (a run is a maximum substring of consecutive identical symbols). The problem has been shown to be NP-hard and to be fixed-parameter tractable when the parameter is the size of the alphabet on which the input string is defined. In this paper we further investigate the complexity of the problem and we show that it is fixed-parameter tracta…
In this paper, we propose a data structure, a quadruple neighbor list (QN-list, for short), to support real time queries of all longest increasing subsequence (LIS) and LIS with constraints over sequential data streams. The QN-List built by our algorithm requires $O(w)$ space, where $w$ is the time window size. The running time for building the initial QN-List takes $O(w\log w)$ time. Applying the QN-List, insertion of the new item takes $O(\log w)$ time and deletion of the first item takes $O(w)$ time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to support both LIS enumeration and LI…
In this paper we address the constrained longest common subsequence problem. Given two sequences $X$, $Y$ and a constrained sequence $P$, a sequence $Z$ is a constrained longest common subsequence for $X$ and $Y$ with respect to $P$ if $Z$ is the longest subsequence of $X$ and $Y$ such that $P$ is a subsequence of $Z$. Recently, Tsai \cite{Tsai} proposed an $O(n^2 \cdot m^2 \cdot r)$ time algorithm to solve this problem using dynamic programming technique, where $n$, $m$ and $r$ are the lengths of $X$, $Y$ and $P$, respectively. In this paper, we present a simple algorithm to solve the constra…
In this paper, we provide new approximation algorithms for dynamic variations of the longest increasing subsequence (\textsf{LIS}) problem, and the complementary distance to monotonicity (\textsf{DTM}) problem. In this setting, operations of the following form arrive sequentially: (i) add an element, (ii) remove an element, or (iii) substitute an element for another. At every point in time, the algorithm has an approximation to the longest increasing subsequence (or distance to monotonicity). We present a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for \textsf{DTM} with polylogarithmic worst-case update t…
We study dynamic algorithms for the longest increasing subsequence (\textsf{LIS}) problem. A dynamic \textsf{LIS} algorithm maintains a sequence subject to operations of the following form arriving one by one: (i) insert an element, (ii) delete an element, or (iii) substitute an element for another. After performing each operation, the algorithm must report the length of the longest increasing subsequence of the current sequence. Our main contribution is the first exact dynamic \textsf{LIS} algorithm with sublinear update time. More precisely, we present a randomized algorithm that performs ea…
The problem of finding the longest common subsequence (LCS) for a set of sequences is a very interesting and challenging problem in computer science. This problem is NP-complete, but because of its importance, many heuristic algorithms have been proposed, such as Long Run algorithm and Expansion algorithm. However, the performance of many current heuristic algorithms deteriorates fast when the number of sequences and sequence length increase. In this paper, we have proposed a post process heuristic algorithm for the LCS problem, the Deposition and Extension algorithm (DEA). This algorithm firs…
In this work, we consider a variant of the classical Longest Common Subsequence problem called Doubly-Constrained Longest Common Subsequence (DC-LCS). Given two strings s1 and s2 over an alphabet A, a set C_s of strings, and a function Co from A to N, the DC-LCS problem consists in finding the longest subsequence s of s1 and s2 such that s is a supersequence of all the strings in Cs and such that the number of occurrences in s of each symbol a in A is upper bounded by Co(a). The DC-LCS problem provides a clear mathematical formulation of a sequence comparison problem in Computational Biology a…
This paper performs the analysis necessary to bound the running time of known, efficient algorithms for generating all longest common subsequences. That is, we bound the running time as a function of input size for algorithms with time essentially proportional to the output size. This paper considers both the case of computing all distinct LCSs and the case of computing all LCS embeddings. Also included is an analysis of how much better the efficient algorithms are than the standard method of generating LCS embeddings. A full analysis is carried out with running times measured as a function of…
Polynomial-Time Solutions for Longest Common Subsequence Related Problems Between a Sequence and a Pangenome Graph
College of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics（贵州财经大学大数据统计学院）；Algorithm and Computational Complexity Laboratory of School of Information, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics（贵州财经大学信息学院算法与计算复杂性实验室）
The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of two strings is a fundamental string similarity measure with a classical dynamic programming solution taking quadratic time. Despite significant efforts, little progress was made in improving the runtime. Even in the realm of approximation, not much was known for linear time algorithms beyond the trivial $\sqrt{n}$-approximation. Recent breakthrough result provided a $n^{0.497}$-factor approximation algorithm [HSSS19], which was more recently improved to a $n^{0.4}$-factor one [BCD21]. The latter paper also showed a $n^{2-2.5α}$ time algorithm which outpu…
Given a set of $k$ strings $I$, their longest common subsequence (LCS) is the string with the maximum length that is a subset of all the strings in $I$. A data-structure for this problem preprocesses $I$ into a data-structure such that the LCS of a set of query strings $Q$ with the strings of $I$ can be computed faster. Since the problem is NP-hard for arbitrary $k$, we allow an error that allows some characters to be replaced by other characters. We define the approximation version of the problem with an extra input $m$, which is the length of the regular expression (regex) that describes the…
In this paper, we revisit the much studied LCS problem for two given sequences. Based on the algorithm of Iliopoulos and Rahman for solving the LCS problem, we have suggested 3 new improved algorithms. We first reformulate the problem in a very succinct form. The problem LCS is abstracted to an abstract data type DS on an ordered positive integer set with a special operation Update(S,x). For the two input sequences X and Y of equal length n, the first improved algorithm uses a van Emde Boas tree for DS and its time and space complexities are O(R\log\log n+n) and O(R), where R is the number of …
In this paper we define a new problem, motivated by computational biology, $LCSk$ aiming at finding the maximal number of $k$ length $substrings$, matching in both input strings while preserving their order of appearance. The traditional LCS definition is a special case of our problem, where $k = 1$. We provide an algorithm, solving the general case in $O(n^2)$ time, where $n$ is the length of the input strings, equaling the time required for the special case of $k=1$. The space requirement of the algorithm is $O(kn)$. %, however, in order to enable %backtracking of the solution, $O(n^2)$ spac…
We consider the general problem of the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) on weighted sequences. Weighted sequences are an extension of classical strings, where in each position every letter of the alphabet may occur with some probability. Previous results presented a PTAS and noticed that no FPTAS is possible unless P=NP. In this paper we essentially close the gap between upper and lower bounds by improving both. First of all, we provide an EPTAS for bounded alphabets (which is the most natural case), and prove that there does not exist any EPTAS for unbounded alphabets unless FPT=W[1]. Further…
A repetition free Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of two sequences x and y is an LCS of x and y where each symbol may appear at most once. Let R denote the length of a repetition free LCS of two sequences of n symbols each one chosen randomly, uniformly, and independently over a k-ary alphabet. We study the asymptotic, in n and k, behavior of R and establish that there are three distinct regimes, depending on the relative speed of growth of n and k. For each regime we establish the limiting behavior of R. In fact, we do more, since we actually establish tail bounds for large deviations of R f…
In this paper, we study edit distance (ED) and longest common subsequence (LCS) in the asymmetric streaming model, introduced by Saks and Seshadhri [SS13]. As an intermediate model between the random access model and the streaming model, this model allows one to have streaming access to one string and random access to the other string. Our first main contribution is a systematic study of space lower bounds for ED and LCS in the asymmetric streaming model. Previously, there are no explicitly stated results in this context, although some lower bounds about LCS can be inferred from the lower boun…
Nokia Bell Labs（诺基亚贝尔实验室）；Rutgers University（罗格斯大学）
Finding the common subsequences of $L$ multiple strings has many applications in the area of bioinformatics, computational linguistics, and information retrieval. A well-known result states that finding a Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) for $L$ strings is NP-hard, e.g., the computational complexity is exponential in $L$. In this paper, we develop a randomized algorithm, referred to as {\em Random-MCS}, for finding a random instance of Maximal Common Subsequence ($MCS$) of multiple strings. A common subsequence is {\em maximal} if inserting any character into the subsequence no longer yields a…
The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) is a fundamental string similarity measure, and computing the LCS of two strings is a classic algorithms question. A textbook dynamic programming algorithm gives an exact algorithm in quadratic time, and this is essentially best possible under plausible fine-grained complexity assumptions, so a natural problem is to find faster approximation algorithms. When the inputs are two binary strings, there is a simple $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation in linear time: compute the longest common all-0s or all-1s subsequence. It has been open whether a better approximation …
The problem of finding a longest common subsequence of two main sequences with some constraint that must be a substring of the result (STR-IC-LCS) was formulated recently. It is a variant of the constrained longest common subsequence problem. As the known algorithms for the STR-IC-LCS problem are cubic-time, the presented quadratic-time algorithm is significantly faster.
String similarity, longest common subsequence and shortest edit scripts are the triplets of problem that related to each other. There are different algorithms exist to generate edit script by solving longest common subsequence problem. This paper proposes an algorithm that uses string similarity problem to generate shortest edit script. For this we use the famous Levenshtein distance algorithm, which computes a numerical value that represents similarity between the strings from 0 to n, where n is the length of longest input string, and produce the shortest edit script which contains instructio…
Given a sequence $S$ of length $n$, a letter-duplicated subsequence is a subsequence of $S$ in the form of $x_1^{d_1}x_2^{d_2}\cdots x_k^{d_k}$ with $x_i\inΣ$, $x_j\neq x_{j+1}$ and $d_i\geq 2$ for all $i$ in $[k]$ and $j$ in $[k-1]$. A linear time algorithm for computing the longest letter-duplicated subsequence (LLDS) of $S$ can be easily obtained. In this paper, we focus on two variants of this problem. We first consider the constrained version when $Σ$ is unbounded, each letter appears in $S$ at least 6 times and all the letters in $Σ$ must appear in the solution. We show that the problem …
For a set of mulitple sequences, their patterns,Longest Common Subsequences (LCS) and Shortest Common Supersequences (SCS) represent different aspects of these sequences profile, and they can all be used for biological sequence comparisons and analysis. Revealing the relationship between the patterns and LCS,SCS might provide us with a deeper view of the patterns of biological sequences, in turn leading to better understanding of them. However, There is no careful examinaton about the relationship between patterns, LCS and SCS. In this paper, we have analyzed their relation, and given some lem…
For graph learning tasks, many existing methods utilize a message-passing mechanism where vertex features are updated iteratively by aggregation of neighbor information. This strategy provides an efficient means for graph features extraction, but obtained features after many iterations might contain too much information from other vertices, and tend to be similar to each other. This makes their representations less expressive. Learning graphs using paths, on the other hand, can be less adversely affected by this problem because it does not involve all vertex neighbors. However, most of them ca…
