arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.14623cs.CL
收藏

Neural Natural Language Inference Models Partially Embed Theories of Lexical Entailment and Negation

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Allen Institute for AI(艾伦人工智能研究所)

Atticus Geiger, Kyle Richardson, Christopher Potts

英文摘要:

We address whether neural models for Natural Language Inference (NLI) can learn the compositional interactions between lexical entailment and negation, using four methods: the behavioral evaluation methods of (1) challenge test sets and (2) systematic generalization tasks, and the structural evaluation methods of (3) probes and (4) interventions. To facilitate this holistic evaluation, we present Monotonicity NLI (MoNLI), a new naturalistic dataset focused on lexical entailment and negation. In our behavioral evaluations, we find that models trained on general-purpose NLI datasets fail systematically on MoNLI examples containing negation, but that MoNLI fine-tuning addresses this failure. In our structural evaluations, we look for evidence that our top-performing BERT-based model has learned to implement the monotonicity algorithm behind MoNLI. Probes yield evidence consistent with this conclusion, and our intervention experiments bolster this, showing that the causal dynamics of the model mirror the causal dynamics of this algorithm on subsets of MoNLI. This suggests that the BERT model at least partially embeds a theory of lexical entailment and negation at an algorithmic level.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑