arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2101.07397cs.CL
收藏

自然语言纯假设推理模型中的词汇刺激性研究

Exploring Lexical Irregularities in Hypothesis-Only Models of Natural Language Inference

Purdue University(普渡大学)

Qingyuan Hu, Yi Zhang, Kanishka Misra, Julia Rayz

摘要:

自然语言推理(NLI)或文本蕴涵识别(RTE)是预测一对句子(前提和假设)之间的蕴涵关系的任务。这项任务已被描述为一个有价值的测试场的语义表示的发展,是自然语言理解评估基准的关键组成部分。理解蕴涵的模型应该对前提和假设都进行编码。然而,Poliak等人的实验揭示了这些模型对仅在假设中观察到的模式的强烈偏好,基于10个数据集的比较。他们的研究结果表明,假设中存在统计不规则性,使模型与最先进的模型竞争。虽然重铸数据集由于最少的人为干预而提供了大规模的NLI实例生成,但生成它们的论文并没有提供对可能使NLI模型产生偏差的潜在统计模式的细粒度分析。在这项工作中,我们分析了在Poliak等人提供的一个重铸数据集上训练的仅假设模型。我们的研究结果表明,存在潜在的词汇偏见,可能有助于膨胀的模型性能。

英文摘要:

Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences (premise and hypothesis). This task has been described as a valuable testing ground for the development of semantic representations, and is a key component in natural language understanding evaluation benchmarks. Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis. However, experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis, based on a 10 dataset comparison. Their results indicated the existence of statistical irregularities present in the hypothesis that bias the model into performing competitively with the state of the art. While recast datasets provide large scale generation of NLI instances due to minimal human intervention, the papers that generate them do not provide fine-grained analysis of the potential statistical patterns that can bias NLI models. In this work, we analyze hypothesis-only models trained on one of the recast datasets provided in Poliak et al. for word-level patterns. Our results indicate the existence of potential lexical biases that could contribute to inflating the model performance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑