arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2004.14407cs.LGcond-mat.mtrl-sci
收藏

从稀疏数据集学习:通过机器学习预测混凝土强度

Learning from Sparse Datasets: Predicting Concrete's Strength by Machine Learning

University of California, Los Angeles(加州大学洛杉矶分校)

Boya Ouyang, Yuhai Li, Yu Song, Feishu Wu, Huizi Yu, Yongzhe Wang, Mathieu Bauchy, Gaurav Sant

摘要:

尽管在过去的几十年里,巨大的努力,以建立混凝土配比和强度之间的关系,一个强大的基于知识的模型,准确的混凝土强度预测仍然缺乏。作为基于物理或化学模型的替代方案,数据驱动的机器学习(ML)方法为这个问题提供了新的解决方案。虽然这种方法很有希望处理混凝土混合比和强度之间复杂的、非线性的、非加性的关系,但ML的一个主要局限性在于模型训练需要大量数据集。这是一个值得关注的问题,因为可靠、一致的强度数据相当有限,特别是对于实际的工业混凝土。在这里,基于对工业生产的混凝土测量抗压强度的大型数据集(> 10,000个观测值)的分析,我们比较了选择ML算法的能力,以“学习”如何可靠地预测混凝土强度作为数据集大小的函数。基于这些结果,我们讨论了给定模型最终的准确度(在大型数据集上训练时)与训练该模型实际需要多少数据之间的竞争。

英文摘要:

Despite enormous efforts over the last decades to establish the relationship between concrete proportioning and strength, a robust knowledge-based model for accurate concrete strength predictions is still lacking. As an alternative to physical or chemical-based models, data-driven machine learning (ML) methods offer a new solution to this problem. Although this approach is promising for handling the complex, non-linear, non-additive relationship between concrete mixture proportions and strength, a major limitation of ML lies in the fact that large datasets are needed for model training. This is a concern as reliable, consistent strength data is rather limited, especially for realistic industrial concretes. Here, based on the analysis of a large dataset (>10,000 observations) of measured compressive strengths from industrially-produced concretes, we compare the ability of select ML algorithms to "learn" how to reliably predict concrete strength as a function of the size of the dataset. Based on these results, we discuss the competition between how accurate a given model can eventually be (when trained on a large dataset) and how much data is actually required to train this model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑