arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.10236cs.CY

Digital tools against COVID-19: Framing the ethical challenges and how to address them

Urs Gasser, Marcello Ienca, James Scheibner, Joanna Sleigh, Effy Vayena

英文摘要:

Data collection and processing via digital public health technologies are being promoted worldwide by governments and private companies as strategic remedies for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening lockdown measures. However, the ethical and legal boundaries of deploying digital tools for disease surveillance and control purposes are unclear, and a rapidly evolving debate has emerged globally around the promises and risks of mobilizing digital tools for public health. To help scientists and policymakers navigate technological and ethical uncertainty, we present a typology of the primary digital public health applications currently in use. Namely: proximity and contact tracing, symptom monitoring, quarantine control, and flow modeling. For each, we discuss context-specific risks, cross-sectional issues, and ethical concerns. Finally, in recognition of the need for practical guidance, we propose a navigation aid for policymakers made up of ten steps for the ethical use of digital public health tools.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑