arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.00791astro-ph.HE
收藏

在蟹状星云脉冲星中两个大故障之后发现延迟的自旋上升行为,以及这种过程的统计数据

Discovery of delayed spin-up behavior following two large glitches in the Crab pulsar, and the statistics of such processes

M. Y. Ge, S. N. Zhang, F. J. Lu, T. P. Li, J. P. Yuan, X. P. Zheng, Y. Huang, S. J. Zheng, Y. P. Chen, Z. Chang, Y. L. Tuo, Q. Cheng, C. Güngör, L. M. Song, Y. … 展开作者

M. Y. Ge, S. N. Zhang, F. J. Lu, T. P. Li, J. P. Yuan, X. P. Zheng, Y. Huang, S. J. Zheng, Y. P. Chen, Z. Chang, Y. L. Tuo, Q. Cheng, C. Güngör, L. M. Song, Y. P. Xu, X. L. Cao, Y. Chen, C. Z. Liu, S. Zhang, J. L. Qu, Q. C. Bu, C. Cai, G. Chen, L. Chen, M. Z. Chen, T. X. Chen, Y. B. Chen, W. Cui, W. W. Cui, J. K. Deng, Y. W. Dong, Y. Y. Du, M. X. Fu, G. H. Gao, H. Gao, M. Gao, Y. D. Gu, J. Guan, C. C. Guo, D. W. Han, L. F. Hao, J. Huo, S. M. Jia, L. H. Jiang, W. C. Jiang, C. J. Jin, J. Jin, Y. J. Jin, L. D. Kong, B. Li, D. Li, C. K. Li, G. Li, M. S. Li, W. Li, X. Li, X. B. Li, X. F. Li, Y. G. Li, Z. W. Li, Z. X. Li, Z. Y. Liu, X. H. Liang, J. Y. Liao, G. Q. Liu, H. W. Liu, X. J. Liu, Y. N. Liu, B. Lu, X. F. Lu, Q. Luo, T. Luo, X. Ma, B. Meng, Y. Nang, J. Y. Nie, G. Ou, N. Sai, R. C. Shang, X. Y. Song, L. Sun, Y. Tan, L. Tao, C. Wang, G. F. Wang, J. Wang, J. B. Wang, M. Wang, N. Wang, W. S. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Y. S. Wang, X. Y. Wen, Z. G. Wen, B. B. Wu, B. Y. Wu, M. Wu, G. C. Xiao, S. Xiao, S. L. Xiong, Y. H. Xu, W. M. Yan, J. W. Yang, S. Yang, Y. J. Yang, Y. J. Yang, Q. B. Yi, Q. Q. Yin, Y. You, Y. L. Yue, A. M. Zhang, C. M. Zhang, D. P. Zhang, F. Zhang, H. M. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. Zhang, W. C. Zhang, W. Zhang, W. Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. F. Zhang, Y. J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. L. Zhang, H. S. Zhao, X. F. Zhao, W. Zheng, D. K. Zhou, J. F. Zhou, X. Zhou, R. L. Zhuang, Y. X. Zhu, Y. Zhu

摘要:

毛刺对应于旋转频率($ν$)及其导数($\dotν$)的突然跳跃,其起源仍然没有得到很好的理解,部分原因是大多数毛刺的跳跃过程没有很好的时间分辨。在1989年,1996年和2017年发现了蟹状星云脉冲星的三个大故障,这些故障被发现在正常恢复过程之前延迟了自旋过程。在这里,我们报告了蟹状星云脉冲星在2004年和2011年发生的另外两个故障,我们发现了延迟的自旋过程,并提供了2017年发生的最大故障的精确参数。毛刺的初始上升时间确定为$<0.48$小时。我们还进行了统计研究,这五个毛刺与观察到的自旋过程。2004年和2011年发生的两次故障分别延迟了$1.7\pm0.8$ \,天和$1.6\pm0.4$ \,天的启动时间尺度($τ_{1}$)。我们发现这五个毛刺的$Δν$与$|Δ{\dotν}|$的关系与没有检测到延迟自旋上升过程的毛刺相似,表明它们在性质上与其他毛刺相似,只是它们具有更大的幅度。对于这五个毛刺,延迟自旋上升过程($|Δν_{\rm d1}|$)和恢复过程($Δν_{\rm d2}$)的幅度,它们的时间尺度($τ_{1}$,$τ_{2}$),以及自旋频率($Δν_{\rm p}$)和总频率阶跃($Δν_{\rm g}$)的永久变化具有正相关性。从这些相关性,我们认为,延迟自旋的过程是常见的所有毛刺,但太短,因此难以检测到大多数毛刺。

英文摘要:

Glitches correspond to sudden jumps of rotation frequency ($ν$) and its derivative ($\dotν$) of pulsars, the origin of which remains not well understood yet, partly because the jump processes of most glitches are not well time-resolved. There are three large glitches of the Crab pulsar, detected in 1989, 1996 and 2017, which were found to have delayed spin-up processes before the normal recovery processes. Here we report two additional glitches of the Crab pulsar occurred in 2004 and 2011 for which we discovered delayed spin up processes, and present refined parameters of the largest glitch occurred in 2017. The initial rising time of the glitch is determined as $<0.48$ hour. We also carried out a statistical study of these five glitches with observed spin-up processes. The two glitches occurred in 2004 and 2011 have delayed spin-up time scales ($τ_{1}$) of $1.7\pm0.8$\,days and $1.6\pm0.4$\,days, respectively. We find that the $Δν$ vs. $|Δ{\dotν}|$ relation of these five glitches is similar to those with no detected delayed spin-up process, indicating that they are similar to the others in nature except that they have larger amplitudes. For these five glitches, the amplitudes of the delayed spin-up process ($|Δν_{\rm d1}|$) and recovery process ($Δν_{\rm d2}$), their time scales ($τ_{1}$, $τ_{2}$), and permanent changes in spin frequency ($Δν_{\rm p}$) and total frequency step ($Δν_{\rm g}$) have positive correlations. From these correlations, we suggest that the delayed spin-up processes are common for all glitches, but are too short and thus difficult to be detected for most glitches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑