arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2002.03059math.OCeess.SP
收藏

时间序列聚合中的极端事件:最佳住宅能源供应系统的案例研究

Extreme events in time series aggregation: A case study for optimal residential energy supply systems

Holger Teichgraeber, Constantin P. Lindenmeyer, Nils Baumgärtner, Leander Kotzur, Detlef Stolten, Martin Robinius, Andre Bardow, Adam R. Brandt

摘要:

考虑到可再生能源供应的不稳定性,能源系统最优化问题需要高的时间分辨率。许多模型使用时间序列聚类来找到代表性的周期,以减少时间序列输入数据的量,并使最优化问题在计算上易于处理。然而,聚类方法去除峰值和其他极端事件,这对于实现鲁棒的系统设计是重要的。我们提出了一个一般的决策框架,包括极端事件在一组有代表性的时期。我们介绍了一种方法来找到极端周期的基础上松弛变量的最优化问题本身。我们的方法进行了评估和基准与其他极端时期包含方法从文献中的设计和运营最优化问题:住宅能源供应系统。我们的方法确保了在住宅能源供应系统的全部输入数据的可行性,虽然设计优化是在减少的数据集上进行的。我们发现,使用极端的周期作为代表性的周期的一部分,提高了3%到75%以上的优化结果的准确性取决于系统的约束条件相比,仅聚类的结果,从而降低了系统成本,提高了系统可靠性。

英文摘要:

To account for volatile renewable energy supply, energy systems optimization problems require high temporal resolution. Many models use time-series clustering to find representative periods to reduce the amount of time-series input data and make the optimization problem computationally tractable. However, clustering methods remove peaks and other extreme events, which are important to achieve robust system designs. We present a general decision framework to include extreme events in a set of representative periods. We introduce a method to find extreme periods based on the slack variables of the optimization problem itself. Our method is evaluated and benchmarked with other extreme period inclusion methods from the literature for a design and operations optimization problem: a residential energy supply system. Our method ensures feasibility over the full input data of the residential energy supply system although the design optimization is performed on the reduced data set. We show that using extreme periods as part of representative periods improves the accuracy of the optimization results by 3% to more than 75% depending on system constraints compared to results with clustering only, and thus reduces system cost and enhances system reliability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑