arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.06361cs.CL

理解不良的词嵌入关联

Understanding Undesirable Word Embedding Associations

Vector Institute(矢量研究院);University of Toronto(多伦多大学)

Kawin Ethayarajh, David Duvenaud, Graeme Hirst

AI总结:

本研究针对词嵌入捕捉不良关联的问题,证明子空间投影事后去偏见在特定条件下等价于无偏见语料库训练,发现WEAT高估偏见,提出RIPA度量,实验显示SGNS不放大多数词性别关联但会放大刻板印象词的性别关联。

摘要:

词嵌入常因捕捉到性别刻板印象等不良词关联而受到批评,但衡量和消除此类偏见的方法仍未被充分理解。我们证明,对于任何隐式进行矩阵分解的嵌入模型,使用子空间投影(Bolukbasi等人,2016)事后消除偏见,在某些条件下等价于在无偏见语料库上进行训练。我们还证明,词嵌入最常用的关联测试WEAT会系统地高估偏见。鉴于子空间投影方法已被证明有效,我们用它推导了一种名为关系内积关联(relational inner product association,RIPA)的新关联度量。用RIPA进行的实验表明,平均而言,带负采样的跳元模型(skipgram with negative sampling,SGNS)不会让大多数词比训练语料库中的词更具性别特征;但对于性别刻板印象词,SGNS实际上会放大语料库中的性别关联。

英文摘要:

Word embeddings are often criticized for capturing undesirable word associations such as gender stereotypes. However, methods for measuring and removing such biases remain poorly understood. We show that for any embedding model that implicitly does matrix factorization, debiasing vectors post hoc using subspace projection (Bolukbasi et al., 2016) is, under certain conditions, equivalent to training on an unbiased corpus. We also prove that WEAT, the most common association test for word embeddings, systematically overestimates bias. Given that the subspace projection method is provably effective, we use it to derive a new measure of association called the $\textit{relational inner product association}$ (RIPA). Experiments with RIPA reveal that, on average, skipgram with negative sampling (SGNS) does not make most words any more gendered than they are in the training corpus. However, for gender-stereotyped words, SGNS actually amplifies the gender association in the corpus.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑