arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1908.05901cs.CRcs.CYcs.HC
收藏

多因素身份验证用户感知评价的系统评价

Evaluating User Perception of Multi-Factor Authentication: A Systematic Review

Sanchari Das, Bingxing Wang, Zachary Tingle, L. Jean Camp

摘要:

传统的单因素身份认证的安全漏洞已经成为安全从业者和研究人员关注的主要问题。为了减少单点故障,新的和技术先进的多因素身份验证(MFA)工具已被开发作为安全解决方案。然而,这些工具的可用性和采用引起了人们的关注。一个明显的解决方案可以被视为进行用户研究,以创建更用户友好的MFA工具。为了了解更多信息,我们对最近发表的主要关注MFA技术的学术论文(N = 623)进行了系统的文献综述。虽然大多数这些论文(m = 300)提出了新的MFA工具,只有9.1%的论文进行了任何用户评价研究。我们对以用户为中心的研究(n = 57)的荟萃分析表明,研究人员发现,较低的采用率是不可避免的MFA,而回避是普遍的强制使用。此外,我们注意到在以用户为中心的研究中有几个报告和方法上的差异。我们确定了参与者招募的趋势,这表明了人口统计学偏见。

英文摘要:

Security vulnerabilities of traditional single factor authentication has become a major concern for security practitioners and researchers. To mitigate single point failures, new and technologically advanced Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) tools have been developed as security solutions. However, the usability and adoption of such tools have raised concerns. An obvious solution can be viewed as conducting user studies to create more user-friendly MFA tools. To learn more, we performed a systematic literature review of recently published academic papers (N = 623) that primarily focused on MFA technologies. While majority of these papers (m = 300) proposed new MFA tools, only 9.1% of papers performed any user evaluation research. Our meta-analysis of user focused studies (n = 57) showed that researchers found lower adoption rate to be inevitable for MFAs, while avoidance was pervasive among mandatory use. Furthermore, we noted several reporting and methodological discrepancies in the user focused studies. We identified trends in participant recruitment that is indicative of demographic biases.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑