arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.03514q-bio.NCq-bio.QM
收藏

脑结构网络可控性方法学考虑的实用指南

A practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks

Teresa M. Karrer, Jason Z. Kim, Jennifer Stiso, Ari E. Kahn, Fabio Pasqualetti, Ute Habel, Danielle S. Bassett

摘要:

预测大脑如何通过内部或外部控制被驱动到特定状态,需要对神经连接和活动之间的关系有基本的了解。网络控制理论是物理和工程科学的一个强大工具,可以提供有关这种关系的见解;它形式化了复杂系统的动力学如何从其互连单元的底层结构中产生的研究。鉴于最近在神经科学中使用网络控制理论,现在是时候提供一个实用的指导,在结构脑网络的可控性的方法考虑。在这里,我们提供了一个系统的框架概述,研究经常研究的控制指标的建模选择的影响,并提出潜在的有用的理论扩展。我们将我们的讨论、数值演示和理论进展建立在一个高分辨率弥散成像数据集上,该数据集包含10名健康年轻人在大约1小时的扫描中获得的730个弥散方向。在对该理论进行了教学性的介绍之后,我们探讨了建模选择如何影响四个常见的统计量:平均可控性,模态可控性,最小控制能量和最优控制能量。接下来,我们以两种方式扩展了当前的技术水平:首先,通过开发一种替代的结构连接性测量方法,该方法考虑了通过邻接组织的活动的径向传播,其次,通过定义一种补充度量来量化系统的能量景观的复杂性。最后,我们提出了具体的建模建议,并讨论了方法上的限制。

英文摘要:

Predicting how the brain can be driven to specific states by means of internal or external control requires a fundamental understanding of the relationship between neural connectivity and activity. Network control theory is a powerful tool from the physical and engineering sciences that can provide insights regarding that relationship; it formalizes the study of how the dynamics of a complex system can arise from its underlying structure of interconnected units. Given the recent use of network control theory in neuroscience, it is now timely to offer a practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks. Here we provide a systematic overview of the framework, examine the impact of modeling choices on frequently studied control metrics, and suggest potentially useful theoretical extensions. We ground our discussions, numerical demonstrations, and theoretical advances in a dataset of high-resolution diffusion imaging with 730 diffusion directions acquired over approximately 1 hour of scanning from ten healthy young adults. Following a didactic introduction of the theory, we probe how a selection of modeling choices affects four common statistics: average controllability, modal controllability, minimum control energy, and optimal control energy. Next, we extend the current state of the art in two ways: first, by developing an alternative measure of structural connectivity that accounts for radial propagation of activity through abutting tissue, and second, by defining a complementary metric quantifying the complexity of the energy landscape of a system. We close with specific modeling recommendations and a discussion of methodological constraints.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑