arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1808.09657hep-lathep-ph
收藏

在格点量子色动力学输入的标准模型中对$\varepsilon_K$的更新评估

Updated evaluation of $\varepsilon_K$ in the Standard Model with lattice QCD inputs

Jon A. Bailey, Sunkyu Lee, Weonjong Lee, Jaehoon Leem, Sungwoo Park

摘要:

我们在$4σ$水平上报告了$\varepsilon_K$在实验值和理论值之间的强张力,该理论值直接从标准模型使用格点量子色动力学输入,如$\hat{B}_K$、$|V_{cb}|$、$|V_{us}|$、$ξ_0$、$ξ_2$、$ξ_\text{LD}$、$F_K$和$m_c$计算得到。用格点量子色动力学输入的标准模型只描述了$\varepsilon_K$实验值的70%,而不能解释其剩余的30%。我们还发现,当我们使用$|V_{cb}|$(基于QCD求和规则的重夸克展开的结果)的包含值来确定$\varepsilon_K$时,这种张力消失了。这种紧张关系与目前$|V_{cb}|$的排他性和包容性值之间的差异高度相关。为了部分解决$|V_{cb}|$的问题,非常希望使用形状因子的替代参数化(例如BGL参数化)对关于$\bar{B} \to D^* \ell \barν$衰变的整个实验数据集进行全面的重新分析,并与CLN方法的结果进行比较。

英文摘要:

We report a strong tension in $\varepsilon_K$ at the $4σ$ level between the experimental value and the theoretical value calculated directly from the standard model using lattice QCD inputs such as $\hat{B}_K$, $|V_{cb}|$, $|V_{us}|$, $ξ_0$, $ξ_2$, $ξ_\text{LD}$, $F_K$, and $m_c$. The standard model with lattice QCD inputs describes only 70% of the experimental value of $\varepsilon_K$, and does not explain its remaining 30%. We also find that this tension disappears when we use the inclusive value of $|V_{cb}|$ (results of the heavy quark expansion based on QCD sum rules) to determine $\varepsilon_K$. This tension is highly correlated with the present discrepancy between the exclusive and inclusive values of $|V_{cb}|$. In order to resolve, in part, the issue with $|V_{cb}|$, it would be highly desirable to have a comprehensive re-analysis over the entire set of experimental data on the $\bar{B} \to D^* \ell \barν$ decays using an alternative parametrization of the form factors, such as the BGL parametrization, and a comparison with results of the CLN method.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑