arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1808.09288cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
收藏

固体中带间和带内电流的规范不变公式

A Gauge Invariant Formulation of Interband and Intraband Currents in Solids

Guilmot Ernotte, T. J. Hammond, Marco Taucer

摘要:

固态高次谐波产生的实验和模拟经常利用带间和带内电流之间的区别。这两个贡献的总电流已与定性不同的过程,以及物理上可测量的签名,例如在谐波发射的光谱阶段。然而,最近有人认为[P. Földi,Phys. Rev. B 96,035112(2017)]这些量可能取决于计算中使用的规范。由于预期物理量具有与规范无关的值,这就提出了一个问题,即将总电流分解为带间和带内贡献是否具有物理意义,或者仅仅是自然的特定数学表示的一个特征。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨这种明显的模糊性。我们发现,一个密切相关的问题时,计算瞬时波段人口。在这两种情况下的带间/带内电流和瞬时带种群的情况下,我们提出的定义是规范不变的,从而使这些数量计算一致的任何规范。

英文摘要:

Experiments and simulations in solid-state high harmonic generation often make use of the distinction between interband and intraband currents. These two contributions to the total current have been associated with qualitatively different processes, as well as physically measurable signatures, for example in the spectral phase of harmonic emission. However, it was recently argued [P. Földi, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035112 (2017)] that these quantities can depend on the gauge employed in calculations. Since physical quantities are expected to have gauge-independent values, this raises the question of whether the decomposition of the total current into interband and intraband contributions is physically meaningful, or merely a feature of a particular mathematical representation of nature. In this article, we explore this apparent ambiguity. We show that a closely related issue arises when calculating instantaneous band populations. In both the case of inter/intraband currents and in the case of instantaneous band populations, we propose definitions which are gauge-invariant, and thus allow these quantities to be calculated consistently in any gauge.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑