arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1808.04088cs.CRcs.DB
收藏

PPDP中不同的隐私保护技术综述

Review of Different Privacy Preserving Techniques in PPDP

Jalpesh Vasa, Panthini Modi

摘要:

大数据是一个用于非常大的数据集的术语,这些数据集在存储和处理数据方面存在许多困难。分析如此大量的数据将导致信息丢失。本文的主要目标是以一种保护隐私的方式共享数据,同时至少保持信息丢失。包括政府机构、大学详情和病史等的数据,对于组织进行分析和预测趋势和模式是非常必要的,但由于隐私法规,它可能会阻止数据所有者共享数据。通过对k-匿名、l-多样性和t-封闭性等几种匿名化算法的分析,可以在最小的损失下实现隐私保护。承认这些技术有一定的局限性。我们需要在隐私和信息丢失之间保持平衡。我们介绍了一种新的方法称为差分隐私。

英文摘要:

Big data is a term used for a very large data sets that have many difficulties in storing and processing the data. Analysis this much amount of data will lead to information loss. The main goal of this paper is to share data in a way that privacy is preserved while information loss is kept at least. Data that include Government agencies, University details and Medical history etc., are very necessary for an organization to do analysis and predict trends and patterns, but it may prevent the data owner from sharing the data because of privacy regulations [1]. By doing an analysis of several algorithms of Anonymization such as k-anonymity, l-diversity and tcloseness, one can achieve privacy at minimum loss. Admitting these techniques has some limitations. We need to maintain trade-off between privacy and information loss. We introduce a novel approach called Differential Privacy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑