One of the algorithms typically used for fitting anisotropic Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), $α_{\perp}D_{M, \text{fid}}(z)/r_{d, \text{fid}}=D_{M}(z)/r_{d}$, provides an excellent fit as $z\Rightarrow 0$. Yet, at $ z_{\text{drag}} \simeq 1060$, $D_{M, \text{fid}}(1060)/r_{d, \text{fid}}\simeq D_{M}(1060)/r_{d}$. Since $α_{\perp}$ does not change with increasing redshift, we conclude that the algorithms deviate from true solutions with increasing $z$. We investigate that departure through an assumption of a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. At the relatively low redshifts at which isotropic BAO studies were performed, the divergence is smaller than study uncertainties. However, while the transverse measure, $α_{\perp}$ provides a reliable value in real space, not corrupted by redshift distortion, the isotropic measure, $α$, has a radial component, and is influenced by redshift distortion. That distortion recommends against the inclusion of isotropic studies in cosmological parameter evaluations. At the high redshifts of Ly$α$ forest BAO studies, $z\sim$ 2.35, the deviations of the anisotropic BAO algorithms from the flat $Λ$CDM solutions give rise to markedly deceptive results. We replicate an example, in which those algorithms lead to a value of $Ω_{m}$ which is more than 15 per cent lower than that of the flat $Λ$CDM cosmology computation. The BAO algorithms are inappropriate for the next generation of BAO studies. A flat $Λ$CDM analysis offers an alternative means of assessment.
A New Consistency Test for the $Λ$CDM Model using Radial and Transverse BAO Measurements
The International Division of the Second High School Attached to Beijing Normal University(北京师范大学第二附属中学国际部);Department of Astronomy, Tsinghua University(清华大学天文系)
Revisiting the equation of state of dark energy from DESI BAO with SNe Ia and CMB
Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, Henan Academy of Sciences(河南科学院引力波天文研究院);School of Microelectronics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology(青岛科技大学微电子学院)
本文结合DESI BAO DR2、Pantheon+ SNe Ia与Planck 2018 CMB数据,采用红移截断策略分析w0waCDM模型,发现z~0.4-0.8数据会致约2σ偏差,无可靠证据支持其优于ΛCDM模型,偏差或源于统计波动与子样本局限。
Constraints on $H_0$ from WMAP and baryon acoustic osillation measurements
本文报道了由威尔金森微波各向异性探测器(WMAP)结合最新的重子声学振荡(BAO)测量得到的PDMATHAMM的约束条件。我们使用6dF星系巡天(6dFGS),SDSS DR 7主星系样本(MGS),BOSS DR 12星系和eBOSS DR 14类星体的BAO测量。在WMAP宇宙微波背景辐射(CMB)数据中加入最近的BAO观测数据,我们将宇宙学参数$Ω_m=0.298\pm0.005$,$H_0=68.36^{+0.53}_{-0.52}$ km s $^{-1}$ Mpc $^{-1}$,$σ_8=0.8170^{+0.0159}_{-0.0175}$分别约束在空间平坦的$Λ$冷暗物质(CDM)模型中,将$Ω_m=0.302\pm0.008$,$H_0=67.63\pm1.30$ km s $^{-1}$ Mpc $^{-1}$,$σ_8=0.7988^{+0.0345}_{-0.0338}$约束在空间平坦的$w$ CDM模型中.在空间平坦的$w$ CDM模型中,来自CMB和BAO的对$w$的组合约束是$w=-0.96\pm0.07$。我们测量的$H_0$结果更倾向于低于70 km s的$^{-1}$ Mpc $^{-1}$值,与普朗克(2018)关于CMB约束的最新数据一致,但与Riess等人(2018)的局部测量结果存在$3.1\sim 3.5σ$张力。与WMAP单独分析相…
Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $Λ$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity
Institute of Cosmology & Gravitation, University of Portsmouth(朴茨茅斯大学宇宙学与引力研究所);Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Saint Andrews(圣安德鲁斯大学苏格兰大学物理联盟)
Elucidating $Λ$CDM: Impact of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements on the Hubble Constant Discrepancy
我们研究了重子声振荡(BAO)尺度测量的影响之间的差异的哈勃常数($H_0$)推断从本地距离阶梯和普朗克宇宙微波背景(CMB)数据。虽然单独的BAO数据不能约束$H_0$,但我们表明,将最新的BAO结果与WMAP,Atacama宇宙学望远镜(ACT)或南极望远镜(SPT)CMB数据相结合,产生的$H_0$值$2.4-3.1σ$低于距离阶梯,独立于普朗克,这种向下的拉力在一些早期的分析中不太明显,这些分析只使用了角度,平均BAO尺度约束,而不是完整的各向异性信息。同时,BAO和CMB数据的组合也不利于普朗克高多极温度功率谱所偏好的较低的$H_0$值。结合银河系和Lyman-$α$森林(Ly $α$)BAO与原始氘丰度的精确估计,得到了平坦$Λ$ CDM模型的$H_0=66.98\pm1.18$ km s $^{-1}$ Mpc $^{-1}$.这个值是完全独立的CMB各向异性的约束,是$3.0σ$低于最新的距离阶梯约束,虽然$2.4σ$张力也存在于星系BAO和LY $α$ BAO之间。这些结果表明,这是不可能的解释$H_0$的分歧,仅与普朗克数据的系统误差。事实上,即使在删除任何一个数据集之后,紧张局势仍然存在,这使得这个有趣的难题更加难以解决。
Probing dynamical dark energy with late-time data: Evidence, tensions, and the limits of the $w_0w_a$CDM framework
School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-Sen University(中山大学物理与天文学院);National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院国家天文台);Plaksha University(普拉克斯哈大学);College of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院大学天文学与空间科学学院);Graduate Program in Applied Physics, Federal University of Latin-American Integration(拉丁美洲联邦大学应用物理研究生项目);Departamento de Engenharias e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal do Paraná(巴拉那联邦大学工程与自然科学系);Department of Physics, Istanbul Technical University(伊斯坦布尔理工大学物理系)
本文通过结合CMB各向异性、DESI DR2、SDSS-IV、横向/角BAO(BAOtr)和Ia型超新星数据,测试$w_0w_a$CDM(CPL)框架与$Λ$CDM的差异,发现CPL推断依赖于数据集,CMB数据单独使用存在几何退化,而DESI DR2 BAO数据推动重建向弱现今加速发展,相比之下,CMB结合PP\&SH0ES和BAOtr更倾向于中等加速膨胀并显著减少哈勃矛盾。这种行为源于低红移距离信息:BAOtr和DESI/SDSS在$z\lesssim0.5$时偏好不同的BAO距离比,驱动了不同的CPL膨胀历史。通过比较角BAO尺度,包括共同的$z=0.510$点和保守的BAOtr局部插值(无外推),量化了这种不匹配。在CPL中,预重组物理固定,$r_{ m d}$几乎不变,因此$H_0$的变化被晚期膨胀自由度吸收而非声学 horizon的变化。贝叶斯证据同样依赖于低红移数据:当PP\&SH0ES和/或BAOtr包含时,它倾向于CPL,对于CMB单独或CMB+DESI是不确定的,而对于CMB+SDSS则略微倾向于$Λ$CDM。这些结果表明,CPL的明显支持及其缓解哈勃矛盾的能力并非普遍,这促使了更灵活的晚期模型和对BAO系统误差的更仔细审查。
Atlantic Technological University(大西洋科技大学);School of Physics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM)(基础科学研究所物理学院);Department of Physics, Shanghai University(上海大学物理系)
The Role of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in Joint Cosmological Analyses
Boston University(波士顿大学);University of California, Santa Barbara(加州大学圣塔芭芭拉分校);Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory(劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)
BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension
University of Trento(特伦托大学);Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA)-INFN(特伦托基础物理与应用研究所(TIFPA)-意大利国家核物理研究所);Istanbul Technical University(伊斯坦布尔技术大学);University of Sheffield(谢菲尔德大学);Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo(圣埃斯皮里图联邦大学);INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste(意大利国家天体物理研究所的里雅斯特天文台);IFPU – Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe(宇宙基础物理研究所);University of Ioannina(约阿尼纳大学)