We shall given a new effectively computable upper bound of odd perfect numbers whose Euler factors are powers of fixed exponent, improving our old result in T. Yamada, Colloq. Math. 103 (2005), 303--307.
We give necessary conditions satisfied by the set of odd prime divisors of binary perfect polynomials. This allows us to get a new characterization of all the known perfect binary polynomials.
We investigate the integer solutions of Diophantine equations related to perfect numbers. These solutions generalize the example, found by Descartes in 1638, of an odd, ``spoof'' perfect factorization $3^2\cdot 7^2\cdot 11^2\cdot 13^2\cdot 22021^1$. More recently, Voight found the spoof perfect factorization $3^4\cdot 7^2\cdot 11^2\cdot 19^2\cdot(-127)^1$. No other examples appear in the literature. We compute all nontrivial, odd, primitive spoof perfect factorizations with fewer than seven bases -- there are twenty-one in total. We show that the structure of odd, spoof perfect factorizations …
完全奇数的存在性是数论中一个古老的公开问题。欧拉定理指出,如果奇数$ n $是完全的,则$ n $被写为$ n = p ^ rm ^ 2 $,其中$ r, m $是奇数,$ p $是形式为$ 4 k + 1 $和$ (p, m) = 1 $的素数,其中$ (x, y) $表示$ x $和$ y $的最大公约数。在这篇文章中,我们证明了在这个方程中,$ p $的指数$ r $必然等于1。即,如果$ n $是奇完全数,则$ n $被写为$ n = pm ^ 2. $
We study the set $\mathcal{S}$ of odd positive integers $n$ with the property ${2n}/{σ(n)} - 1 = 1/x$, for positive integer $x$, i.e., the set that relates to odd perfect and odd "spoof perfect" numbers. As a consequence, we find that if $D=pq$ denotes a spoof odd perfect number other than Descartes' example, with pseudo-prime factor $p$, then $q>10^{12}$. Furthermore, we find irregularities in the ending digits of integers $n\in\mathcal{S}$ and study aspects of its density, leading us to conjecture that the amount of numbers in $\mathcal{S}$ below $k$ is $\sim10 \log(k)$.
If $N={q^k}{n^2}$ is an odd perfect number given in Eulerian form, then the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture predicts that $k=ν_{q}(N)=1$. In this article, we give a short proof for this conjecture.
Let $N$ be an odd perfect number. Let $ω(N)$ be the number of distinct prime factors of $N$ and let $Ω(N)$ be the total number (counting multiplicity) of prime factors of $N$. We prove that $\frac{99}{37}ω(N) - \frac{187}{37} \leq Ω(N)$ and that if $3\nmid N$, then $\frac{51}{19}ω(N)-\frac{46}{19} \leq Ω(N)$.
We shall show that, for any given primes $\ell\geq 17$ and $p, q\equiv 1\pmod{\ell}$, the diophantine equation $(x^\ell-1)/(x-1)=p^m q$ has at most four positive integral solutions $(x, m)$ and give its application to odd perfect number problem.
Let $p^k m^2$ be an odd perfect number with special prime $p$. Extending previous work of the authors, we prove that the inequality $m < p^k$ follows from $m^2 - p^k = 2^r t$, where $r \geq 2$ and $\gcd(2,t)=1$, under the following hypotheses: (a) $m > t > 2^r$, or (b) $m > 2^r > t$. We also prove that the estimate $m^2 - p^k > 2m$ holds. We can also improve this unconditional estimate to $m^2 - p^k > {313m^2}/315$.
Let $N$ be an odd perfect number and let $a$ be its third largest prime divisor, $b$ be the second largest prime divisor, and $c$ be its largest prime divisor. We discuss steps towards obtaining a non-trivial upper bound on $a$, as well as the closely related problem of improving bounds $bc$, and $abc$. In particular, we prove two results. First we prove a new general bound on any prime divisor of an odd perfect number and obtain as a corollary of that bound that $$a < 2N^{\frac{1}{6}}.$$ Second, we show that $$abc < (2N)^{\frac{3}{5}}.$$ We also show how in certain circumstances these bounds …
We address an arithmetic problem in the ring $\F_2[x]$ related to the fixed points of the sum of divisors function. We study some binary polynomials $A$ such that $σ(A)/A $ is still a binary polynomial. Technically, we prove that the only (unitary) perfect polynomials over $\F_2$ that are products of $x$, $x+1$ and of Mersenne primes are precisely the nine (resp. nine "classes") known ones. This follows from a new result about the factorization of $M^{2h+1} +1$, for a Mersenne prime $M$ and for a positive integer $h$.
Dris conjectured in his masters thesis that the inequality $q^k < n$ always holds, if $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ is an odd perfect number with special prime $q$. In this note, we initially show that either of the two conditions $n < q^k$ or $σ(q)/n < σ(n)/q$ holds. This is achieved by first proving that $σ(q)/n \neq σ(n)/q^k$, where $σ(x)$ is the sum of the divisors of $x$. Using this analysis, we further show that the condition $q < n < q^k$ holds in four out of a total of six cases. Finally, we prove that $n < q^k$, and that this holds unconditionally. This finding disproves both the Dris Conjecture a…
Let $σ(x)$ be the sum of the divisors of $x$. If $N$ is odd and $σ(N) = 2N$, then the odd perfect number $N$ is said to be given in Eulerian form if $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ where $q$ is prime with $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n) = 1$. In this note, we show that $q < n$ implies that Descartes's conjecture (previously Sorli's conjecture), $k = ν_{q}(N) = 1$, is not true. This then implies an unconditional proof for the biconditional $$k = ν_{q}(N) = 1 \Longleftrightarrow n < q.$$ Lastly, following a recent result of Cohen and Sorli, we show that if $q < n$, then either $q > 5$ or $k > 5$ i…
Let $q^k n^2$ be an odd perfect number with special prime $q$. Define the GCDs $$G = \gcd\bigg(σ(q^k),σ(n^2)\bigg)$$ $$H = \gcd\bigg(n^2,σ(n^2)\bigg)$$ and $$I = \gcd\bigg(n,σ(n^2)\bigg).$$ We prove that $G \times H = I^2$. (Note that it is trivial to show that $G \mid I$ and $I \mid H$ both hold.) We then compute expressions for $G, H,$ and $I$ in terms of $σ(q^k)/2, n,$ and $\gcd\bigg(σ(q^k)/2,n\bigg)$. Afterwards, we prove that if $G = H = I$, then $σ(q^k)/2$ is not squarefree. Other natural and related results are derived further. Lastly, we conjecture that the set $$\mathscr{A} = \{m : \g…
We shall give an explicit upper bound for the smallest prime factor of multiperfect numbers of the form $N=p_1^{α_1}\cdots p_s^{α_s} q_1^{β_1}\cdots q_t^{β_t}$ with $β_1, \ldots, β_t$ bounded by a given constant. We shall also give similar results for quasiperfect numbers and relatively prime amicable pairs of opposite parity.
The divisor function $σ(n)$ sums the divisors of $n$. We call $n$ abundant when $σ(n) - n > n$ and perfect when $σ(n) - n = n$. I recently introduced the recursive divisor function $a(n)$, the recursive analog of the divisor function. It measures the extent to which a number is highly divisible into parts, such that the parts are highly divisible into subparts, so on. Just as the divisor function motivates the abundant and perfect numbers, the recursive divisor function motivates their recursive analogs, which I introduce here. A number is recursively abundant, or ample, if $a(n) > n$ and recu…
In this paper we discuss near-perfect numbers of various forms. In particular, we study the existence of near-perfect numbers in the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences, near-perfect values taken by integer polynomials and repdigit near-perfect numbers.
We adapt (over $\mathbb{F}_2$) the general notions of multiplicative function, Dirichlet convolution and Inverse. We get some interesting results, namely necessary conditions for an odd binary polynomial to be perfect. Note that we are inspired by the "analogous" works in \cite{Gall-Rahav-newcongr} and \cite{Touchard}, about odd perfect numbers.
Let $k$ be an imaginary quadratic number field, and $F/k$ a finite abelian extension of Galois group $G$. We investigate the relationship between the conjectural special elements introduced in \cite{Burns-DeJeu-Gangl} and ETNC in the semi-simple case. This provides a partial proof of the conjecture for $F/k$ under certain conditions.