Government statistical agencies collect enormously valuable data on the nation's population and business activities. Wide access to these data enables evidence-based policy making, supports new research that improves society, facilitates training for students in data science, and provides resources for the public to better understand and participate in their society. These data also affect the private sector. For example, the Employment Situation in the United States, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, moves markets. Nonetheless, government agencies are under increasing pressure to limit access to data because of a growing understanding of the threats to data privacy and confidentiality.
"De-identification" - stripping obvious identifiers like names, addresses, and identification numbers - has been found inadequate in the face of modern computational and informational resources.
Unfortunately, the problem extends even to the release of aggregate data statistics. This counter-intuitive phenomenon has come to be known as the Fundamental Law of Information Recovery. It says that overly accurate estimates of too many statistics can completely destroy privacy. One may think of this as death by a thousand cuts. Every statistic computed from a data set leaks a small amount of information about each member of the data set - a tiny cut. This is true even if the exact value of the statistic is distorted a bit in order to preserve privacy. But while each statistical release is an almost harmless little cut in terms of privacy risk for any individual, the cumulative effect can be to completely compromise the privacy of some individuals.
The Main Barrier to AI Adoption in the Public Sector Is Lack of Training: How a Structured Method Accompanied Productivity Gains in Two Brazilian Government Cases
Government of the Federal District(联邦区政府的);Federal District School of Government(联邦区政府学院)
"These cameras are just like the Eye of Sauron": A Sociotechnical Threat Model for AI-Driven Smart Home Devices as Perceived by UK-Based Domestic Workers
King’s College London(伦敦国王学院);University of St Andrews(圣安德鲁斯大学);Universitat Politècnica de València(瓦伦西亚理工大学);INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)(INGENIO(西班牙国家研究委员会-瓦伦西亚理工大学))
A Roadmap for Greater Public Use of Privacy-Sensitive Government Data: Workshop Report
Purdue University(普渡大学);Vanderbilt University(范德比尔特大学);Vanderbilt University Medical Center(范德比尔特大学医学中心);MIT Media Lab(麻省理工学院媒体实验室);National Center for Health Statistics, CDC(国家健康统计中心,CDC);Penn State University(宾夕法尼亚州立大学)