电子信息获取与隐私权保护：再思考：“实际模糊”
Electronic Access to Information and the Privacy Paradox: Rethinking :'Practical Obscurity'
摘要：
本文论述了美国最高法院根据联邦信息自由法在记者委员会诉司法部一案中的中心目的。本文通过分析下级联邦法院对“记者委员会”的解释意见，以及最高法院的意见对《信息自由法》实施的影响，发现最高法院的意见大大缩小了《信息自由法》的适用范围，限制了《信息自由法》实现电子信息民主化的力量。为了帮助弥补信息自由对公共利益的损害，作者敦促对《隐私法》案件Tobey诉NRB进行司法审议，该案件更微妙地处理了政府收集的关于个人的信息。该文件的结论是，《隐私法》清楚地表明，信息，特别是计算机化的数据库，不能为了访问的目的而被绝对对待。
英文摘要：
This article addresses the U.S. Supreme Court's central purpose formulation in Reporters Committee v. Department of Justice under the federal Freedom of Information Act. By examining all lower federal court opinions interpreting Reporters Committee and by analyzing the effects of the Court's opinion on the implementation of the FOIA, the paper finds that the Court's opinion has greatly narrowed the scope of the FOIA and limited the power of EFOIA to democratize electronic information. To assist in remedying the damage to the public interest in freedom of information, the author urges judicial consideration of a Privacy Act case, Tobey v. NRB, that more subtly treats information collected by government about individuals. The paper concludes that the Privacy Act demonstrates clearly that information, particularly computerized databases, can not be treated categorically for purposes of access.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
