arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1609.07780cs.DScs.DM
收藏

浸入闭图类边删除问题的线性核

Linear kernels for edge deletion problems to immersion-closed graph classes

Archontia C. Giannopoulou, Michał Pilipczuk, Dimitrios M. Thilikos, Jean-Florent Raymond, Marcin Wrochna

摘要:

假设$\mathcal{F}$是一个有限图族。我们考虑下面的元问题,称为$\mathcal{F}$ -浸入删除:给定一个图$G$和整数$k$,决定是否删除最多$k$边的$G$可以导致一个图,不包含任何图从$\mathcal{F}$作为浸入。该问题与Fomin等人[FOCS 2012]研究的$\mathcal{F}$ -次要删除问题密切相关,其中删除顶点以从$\mathcal{F}$中删除图的所有次要模型。我们证明,无论何时从$\mathcal{F}$的所有图形连接,至少有一个图的$\mathcal{F}$是平面和次立方,那么$\mathcal{F}$ -沉浸删除问题承认:一个常数因子近似算法运行在时间$O(m^3 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$ ;一个线性内核,可以计算时间$O(m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$ ;和一个$O(2^{O(k)} + m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$时间固定参数算法,其中$n,m$计数的输入图的顶点和边缘。这些结果反映了Fomin等人[FOCS 2012]的发现,他们在假设$\mathcal{F}$中至少有一个图是平面的情况下,获得了$\mathcal{F}$ -次要缺失的一组相似算法结果。一个重要的区别是,我们能够获得$\mathcal{F}$ -浸入删除的线性核,而Fomin等人的核指数对于$\mathcal{F}$ -次要删除很大程度上取决于家族$\mathcal{F}$。事实上,正如Giannopoulou等人[ICALP 2015]所证明的那样,在合理的复杂性假设下,这种依赖性是不可避免的。这揭示了$\mathcal{F}$ -浸没删除的内核化复杂性与$\mathcal{F}$ -次要删除的内核化复杂性完全不同。

英文摘要:

Suppose $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite family of graphs. We consider the following meta-problem, called $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion: given a graph $G$ and integer $k$, decide whether the deletion of at most $k$ edges of $G$ can result in a graph that does not contain any graph from $\mathcal{F}$ as an immersion. This problem is a close relative of the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion problem studied by Fomin et al. [FOCS 2012], where one deletes vertices in order to remove all minor models of graphs from $\mathcal{F}$. We prove that whenever all graphs from $\mathcal{F}$ are connected and at least one graph of $\mathcal{F}$ is planar and subcubic, then the $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion problem admits: a constant-factor approximation algorithm running in time $O(m^3 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$; a linear kernel that can be computed in time $O(m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$; and a $O(2^{O(k)} + m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$-time fixed-parameter algorithm, where $n,m$ count the vertices and edges of the input graph. These results mirror the findings of Fomin et al. [FOCS 2012], who obtained a similar set of algorithmic results for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion, under the assumption that at least one graph from $\mathcal{F}$ is planar. An important difference is that we are able to obtain a linear kernel for $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion, while the exponent of the kernel of Fomin et al. for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion depends heavily on the family $\mathcal{F}$. In fact, this dependence is unavoidable under plausible complexity assumptions, as proven by Giannopoulou et al. [ICALP 2015]. This reveals that the kernelization complexity of $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion is quite different than that of $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑