arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1602.06499physics.ed-ph
收藏

用同构问题评估学生在入门物理中的专长,第一部分:在入门物理非直观问题对上的表现

Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part I: Performance on Non-intuitive Problem Pair from Introductory Physics

Chandralekha Singh

摘要:

与解决问题的专业知识和将学习从一种环境转移到另一种环境的能力相关的调查对于制定策略以帮助学生执行更像专家的任务非常重要。在这里,我们分析了一对非直观的同构问题的书面答复给物理入门的学生和讨论与他们的学生的子集。学生们被要求解释他们的书面答复的理由。我们称成对问题为同构的,因为它们需要相同的物理原理来解决。然而,初始条件是不同的,摩擦力是负责增加的线速度的对象在一个问题,而它是负责降低线速度在另一个问题。我们对学生的反应进行分类,并根据他们不断发展的专业知识评估学生的表现。我们比较了学生对这两个同构问题的分类模式。我们讨论了为什么某些不正确的反应比其他人更好,并阐明了学生的专业知识的演变。我们比较了那些只在其中一个问题上工作的学生在同构问题上的表现,以了解学生是否认识到他们的潜在相似性,以及同构对是否让学生在解决每个问题时有更多的洞察力。

英文摘要:

Investigations related to expertise in problem solving and ability to transfer learning from one context to another are important for developing strategies to help students perform more expert-like tasks. Here we analyze written responses to a pair of non-intuitive isomorphic problems given to introductory physics students and discussions with a subset of students about them. Students were asked to explain their reasoning for their written responses. We call the paired problems isomorphic because they require the same physics principle to solve them. However, the initial conditions are different and the frictional force is responsible for increasing the linear speed of an object in one of the problems while it is responsible for decreasing the linear speed in the other problem. We categorize student responses and evaluate student performance within the context of their evolving expertise. We compare and contrast the patterns of student categorization for the two isomorphic problems. We discuss why certain incorrect responses were better than others and shed light on the evolution of students' expertise. We compare the performance of students who worked on both isomorphic problems with those who worked only on one of the problems to understand whether students recognized their underlying similarity and whether isomorphic pairs gave students additional insight in solving each problem.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑