arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1602.06441physics.ed-ph
收藏

从PER中学到什么:物理教育研究?

What Can Learn from PER: Physics Education Research?

Chandralekha Singh

摘要:

我相信,大多数教师都对一套教学实践产生了信念。当我们教学时,我们尝试不同的方法来教授主题,然后判断这些方法有多成功。几年后,我们的教学工具箱里有了一个技术汇编。新教师处于不利地位,因为他们以前可利用的经验较少。幸运的是,有一群物理学家和物理教育工作者正在研究学生如何学习物理,并且已经能够证明有效的物理教育实践。他们的研究领域被称为PER:物理教育研究。我请PER的领导人之一Alralekha Singh总结了一些最相关的PER调查结果,她的回答如下。

英文摘要:

I believe that most teachers develop a belief in a set of pedagogical practices. As we teach, we try different ways to teach topics and then judge how successful the methods were. After several years, we have a compilation of techniques in our teaching toolbox. New teachers are at a disadvantage because they have fewer prior experiences to draw upon. Luckily, there is a group of physicists and physics educators who are researching how students learn physics, and have been able to show evidence of effective education practices in physics. They field of study is called PER: Physics Education Research. I asked Chandralekha Singh, one of the leaders in PER, to summarize some of the most relevant PER findings and her response follows.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑