arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv physics/0411149physics.ed-ph
收藏

物理教育研究的理论框架:学生思维模式

A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking

Edward F. Redish

摘要:

教育是一个目标导向的领域。但是,如果我们想科学地对待教育,以便我们能够积累、评估和提炼我们所学到的东西,那么我们必须建立一个理论框架,这个框架牢固地植根于客观观察,并通过这个框架可以比较学生思维的不同理论模型。行为科学中的许多已知知识都是可靠的,并且是基于观察的。在本文中,我从神经科学到社会语言学的各个领域中提出了一个过度抽象的理论框架,使我们既能理解我们在课堂上看到的东西,又能比较各种具体的理论方法。我的综合是围绕着对个人认知的分析以及它如何与环境相互作用而组织的。这导致了一个两级系统,一个知识结构级,其中关联模式占主导地位,和控制结构级,其中可以描述的期望和认识论。对于每一个层次,我都为学生的物理思维和学习勾画了一些合理的起始模型,并举例说明理论导向如何影响教学和研究。

英文摘要:

Education is a goal-oriented field. But if we want to treat education scientifically so we can accumulate, evaluate, and refine what we learn, then we must develop a theoretical framework that is strongly rooted in objective observations and through which different theoretical models of student thinking can be compared. Much that is known in the behavioral sciences is robust and observationally based. In this paper, I draw from a variety of fields ranging from neuroscience to sociolinguistics to propose an over-arching theoretical framework that allows us to both make sense of what we see in the classroom and to compare a variety of specific theoretical approaches. My synthesis is organized around an analysis of the individual's cognition and how it interacts with the environment. This leads to a two level system, a knowledge-structure level where associational patterns dominate, and a control-structure level where one can describe expectations and epistemology. For each level, I sketch some plausible starting models for student thinking and learning in physics and give examples of how a theoretical orientation can affect instruction and research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑