arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1602.06100quant-ph
收藏

延迟选择实验与玻姆方法

Delayed Choice Experiments and the Bohm Approach

B. J. Hiley, R. E. Callaghan

摘要:

由惠勒引入并由恩格勒、斯库利、苏斯曼和瓦尔特等人扩展的延迟选择实验,已经形成了一个研究经历量子干涉的粒子的令人困惑的行为的丰富领域。最初的延迟选择实验所提供的惊喜,导致惠勒得出结论,“没有现象是一种现象,直到它是一个观察到的现象”,一个激进的解释,这意味着“过去没有存在,除非它被记录在现在”。然而,玻姆、杜德尼和希利已经表明,玻姆解释给出了一个简单的粒子行为的解释,而不诉诸这样一个激进的解释。这个实验的后续修改导致Aharonov和Vaidman和[ESSW]得出结论,在这些新情况下产生的玻姆型轨迹产生不可接受的属性。例如,如果在干涉仪的一个臂上放置一个空腔,它将被沿着{ \em另一个}臂运动的粒子所激发。换句话说,正是粒子{ \em}没有通过空腔,从而放弃了它的能量!如果这种分析是正确的,这种行为将是真正奇怪的,只能用极端的非局部能量转移来解释,这种能量转移甚至比EPR型过程所需的能量还要强。在本文中,我们表明,这一结论是不正确的,如果玻姆解释是正确的,它给出了一个{ \em本地}的解释,这实际上完全对应于标准的量子力学解释所提供的恩格勒,斯库利,Süssmann和瓦尔特[ESSW]。

英文摘要:

The delayed choice experiments of the type introduced by Wheeler and extended by Englert, Scully, Süssmann and Walther [ESSW], and others, have formed a rich area for investigating the puzzling behaviour of particles undergoing quantum interference. The surprise provided by the original delayed choice experiment, led Wheeler to the conclusion that "no phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon", a radical explanation which implied that "the past has no existence except as it is recorded in the present". However Bohm, Dewdney and Hiley have shown that the Bohm interpretation gives a straightforward account of the behaviour of the particle without resorting to such a radical explanation. The subsequent modifications of this experiment led both Aharonov and Vaidman and [ESSW] to conclude that the resulting Bohm-type trajectories in these new situations produce unacceptable properties. For example, if a cavity is placed in one arm of the interferometer, it will be excited by a particle travelling down the {\em other} arm. In other words it is the particle that does {\em not} go through the cavity that gives up its energy! If this analysis is correct, this behaviour would be truly bizarre and could only be explained by an extreme non-local transfer of energy that is even stronger than that required in an EPR-type processes. In this paper we show that this conclusion is not correct and that if the Bohm interpretation is used correctly, it gives a {\em local} explanation, which actually corresponds exactly to the standard quantum mechanics explanation offered by Englert, Scully, Süssmann and Walther [ESSW].

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑