arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1504.04722stat.CO
收藏

后变分布中参数误设定下Shiryaev-Roberts最快变点检测方法的鲁棒性

On Robustness of the Shiryaev-Roberts Procedure for Quickest Change-Point Detection under Parameter Misspecification in the Post-Change Distribution

Wenyu Du, Aleksey S. Polunchenko, Grigory Sokolov

摘要:

最快变点检测问题的要点是检测一系列连续观测的统计行为中是否存在变化,并以最佳检测速度与最佳检测速度之比进行检测。“假阳性”-风险方式。当最优性被理解为广义贝叶斯意义上的或Shiryaev的多循环设置中定义的,所谓的Shiryaev-Roberts(SR)检测程序被称为是“最好的一个可以做的”,然而,提供的观测值的变化前和变化后的分布都是完全指定的。我们考虑一个更现实的设置,即一个假设的变化后的分布只知道一个参数,使后者可能是“错误的”。感兴趣的问题是相对于变更后分布参数的可能错误指定的其他“最佳”SR程序的灵敏度(或稳健性)。为了回答这个问题,我们提供了一个案例研究,在一个特定的高斯场景中,我们允许SR程序是“失调”的方式改变后的分布参数,并在数值上评估“失调”的影响Shiryaev的(多循环)稳态平均检测延迟提供的SR程序。研究中获得的SR程序的全面定量耐用性表征可用于发展相应的理论,并为SR程序的实际设计提供合理性。本研究的总体定性结论是预期结论:SR程序对于较少(较多)对比度变化和较低(较高)水平的假警报风险的稳健性较低(较高)。

英文摘要:

The gist of the quickest change-point detection problem is to detect the presence of a change in the statistical behavior of a series of sequentially made observations, and do so in an optimal detection-speed-vs.-"false-positive"-risk manner. When optimality is understood either in the generalized Bayesian sense or as defined in Shiryaev's multi-cyclic setup, the so-called Shiryaev-Roberts (SR) detection procedure is known to be the "best one can do", provided, however, that the observations' pre- and post-change distributions are both fully specified. We consider a more realistic setup, viz. one where the post-change distribution is assumed known only up to a parameter, so that the latter may be "misspecified". The question of interest is the sensitivity (or robustness) of the otherwise "best" SR procedure with respect to a possible misspecification of the post-change distribution parameter. To answer this question, we provide a case study where, in a specific Gaussian scenario, we allow the SR procedure to be "out of tune" in the way of the post-change distribution parameter, and numerically assess the effect of the "mistuning" on Shiryaev's (multi-cyclic) Stationary Average Detection Delay delivered by the SR procedure. The comprehensive quantitative robustness characterization of the SR procedure obtained in the study can be used to develop the respective theory as well as to provide a rational for practical design of the SR procedure. The overall qualitative conclusion of the study is an expected one: the SR procedure is less (more) robust for less (more) contrast changes and for lower (higher) levels of the false alarm risk.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑